More Rice with Less Water – Evaluation of Yield and Resource Use Efficiency in Ground Cover Rice Production System with Transplanting
Yueyue Tao,Yanan Zhang,Xinxin Jin,Gustavo Saiz,Ruying Jing,Lin Guo,Meiju Liu,Jianchu Shi,Qiang Zuo,Hongbin Tao,Klaus Butterbach-Bahl,Klaus Dittert,Shan Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2015.04.002
IF: 5.2
2015-01-01
European Journal of Agronomy
Abstract:Adoption of the innovative water-saving ground cover rice production system (GCRPS) based on transplanting of rice seedlings under high soil moisture conditions, resulted in an overall increase in grain yield compared to previous reports on GCRPS employing direct seeding. However, there is a lack of quantitative information on water and nitrogen use efficiency as affected by water and nitrogen management in GCRPS-transplanting. To close this knowledge gap, we conducted a two-year field experiment with traditional paddy rice (Paddy) and GCRPS-transplanting under two soil moisture conditions (GCRPS(sat) and GCRPS(80%)), combined with 3 nitrogen fertilizer management regimes (0,150 kg urea-N/ha as basal fertilizer for Paddy and GCRPS, 150 kg urea-N/ha in 3 splits for Paddy or 75 kg urea-N/ha plus 75 kg N/ha as chicken manure for GCRPS). Grain yield, water and nitrogen use efficiency, stable isotope C-13 of plant shoots and yield components were evaluated.The study showed: (1) compared to Paddy, both GCRPS(sat) and GCRPS(80%) produced significantly more grain yield, while no significant difference in grain yield was found between both GCRPS treatments. (2) Irrigation water use efficiency was increased by 140% in GCRPS(sat) and >500% in GCRPS(80%), while total water use efficiency was improved by 52-96% as compared to Paddy. (3) delta C-13 of plant shoots was significantly higher in GCRPS than in Paddy, and showed significant positive correlations with total and irrigation water use efficiencies. (4) Compared to Paddy, agronomic N use efficiency was significantly higher in both forms of GCRPS. However, N recovery rates were only significantly higher in GCRPS than in Paddy when all urea nitrogen was applied as basal fertilizer before transplanting. With improved fertilizer N management, i.e., split N application in Paddy or combined application of urea and chicken manure in GCRPS, there were no significant differences. Overall, this quantitative evaluation of water use efficiency highlights that the use of GCRPS involving transplanting of seedlings has a great potential to reduce irrigation water input, increase grain yield and resource use efficiency. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.