MTHFR-MMP2 Gene-Gene Interactions May Increase the Risk of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
WANG Siyue,QIN Xueying,WEI Yingqi,ZUO Shangwei,CHEN Hongbo,WANG Mengying,WU Yao,WU Junhui,WANG Xiaowen,WANG Zijing,WANG Jiating,YU Huan,WU Yiqun,WU Tao,HU Yonghua
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16016/j.1000-5404.202101018
2021-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the role of genetic interactions of MTHFR-MMP2 in risks for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Methods A 1: 2 matched case-control study was performed on the AAA patients admitted in the vascular surgery department of Chinese PLA General Hospital between 2011 and 2014, and on the non-AAA patients (control group) with matched gender and age from both the above hospital and a community of Fangshan district during the same period. Standardized questionnaires were used to collect information such as demographic characteristics, medical history and behavioral risk factors. Physical and abdominal aortic ultrasound examinations were carried out, and 5 mL peripheral venous blood samples were collected for genotyping. The interactions between MTHFR and MMP2 genes were investigated using both traditional and machine learning methods, including conditional Logistic regression model, generalized multifactor dimension reduction (GMDR) and EPI stasis sparse factor analysis (EPISFA). Whether the genetic interactions affects the risk of AAA was analyzed and determined, on additive and multiplicative scales, respectively. In addition, relative excess risk of interaction (RERI), attributable proportion of interaction (API) and synergy index (S) were adopted to assess the direction and magnitude of the genetic interactions between MTHFR and MMP2. Results A total of 465 individuals, including 155 AAA patients and 310 non-AAA subjects at a matched ratio of 1: 2 were enrolled in this study during 2011 and 2014. After adjustment of covariates, antagonistic interactions between MTHFR gene and multiple loci of MMP2 gene (rs1132896, rs1477017, rs1992116, rs243847) were found on both additive and multiplicative scales simultaneously (P < 0.05), which could affect AAA risks. And the results were verified by the above 3 methods. GMDR and EPISFA results suggested that there might be high-dimensional interactions between MTHFR and MMP2, with high cross-validation consistency and significant difference (P < 0.05). Conclusion There may be antagonistic gene-gene interactions between MTHFR and MMP2, and the interactions may potentially influence the risks for AAA.