Fat, Energy, and Nitrogen Retention of Artificially Reared Piglets

P. K. Theil,H. Jorgensen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9519
2016-01-01
Journal of Animal Science
Abstract:Modern hyperprolific sows give birth to large litters, and supernumerary piglets, that is, those in excess of number of functional mammary glands, can be artificially reared using milk replacer. A high weaning weight and high fat gain during the suckling period is important to ensure robust pigs after weaning, but genetic selection for high growth rate and lean meat during the past decades may have reduced fat retention during the suckling period. The present study was undertaken to study nutrient retention of piglets reared with milk replacer lower in fat and protein, and comparisons were made with sow-reared piglets from previous studies. Ten 1-wk-old piglets were fed milk replacer for 3 wk and individually housed in metabolic cages in respiration chambers. Once per hour, piglets were fed milk replacer, except for a 4-h period each night. Nitrogen, energy, and fat balances were quantified weekly using balance and respiration trials. Freeze-dried milk replacer contained 229 g protein, 257 g fat, and 21.7 MJ of energy per kilogram DM and it contained 127 g DM/kg on an as-fed basis. Piglet intake of milk, intake of milk solids (P < 0.05), and growth rate (P = 0.06) increased from week to week, whereas the respiratory quotient (0.86), O-2 consumption (37.0 L d(-1) kg-0.68), and heat production (759 kJ d(-1) kg-0.68) were constant. On average, the artificially reared piglets retained 17 g/d of fat, which accounted for 45% of retained energy. For comparison, previous studies have reported fat retention rates between 21 and 32 g/d, corresponding to 55 to 62% of retained energy. Moreover, the artificially reared piglets retained 36 g/d of protein, which is similar to modern genotypes (38 to 39 g/d) and higher than that observed 20 to 30 yr ago (21 to 28 g/d). In conclusion, milk solid intake, growth rate, and nitrogen retention was similar whereas fat intake, fat retention. and proportion of energy retained as fat were considerably lower in artificially reared piglets compared with previous observations on sow-reared piglets.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?