Abstract:Frost, drought and heat are key abiotic constraints to barley production in Australia. To maximise grain yield, crop life-cycle needs to be timed to minimise growth stresses associated with insufficient radiation, frost, heat and drought stress during the critical period for yield determination that occurs prior to and during flowering. To identify optimal flowering times for commercial Australian barley genotypes, we conducted a genotype (G) x environment (E) x management (M) analysis using climate data from locations distributed throughout the Australian barley growing regions. Prior to conducting the GxExM, we parameterised key phenological variables in the APSIM-Barley module for all genotypes using photoperiod and vernalisation data from experimental treatments, then we verified the model using seven independent field experiments. The verification process showed an average RMSE of 1.4-7.2 days and R-2 values of 0.83-1.00 depending on genotype, indicating reasonable performance of the model in simulating phenology. Using the parameterised model, we then characterised water, frost and heat stress patterns for a range of sowing date x genotype combinations. The GxExM showed that optimal flowering period (OFP) was a function of the environment more so than the genotype, and the relative importance of insufficient radiation, frost, heat and water stress varied signficantly with location. OFP was earlier (mid August to late September), in Western Australia and South Australia, while OFP was later (mid-October to mid-November) in Tasmania and Victoria. In low rainfall environments, the duration of the OFP was shorter in most cases than in high rainfall environments. In general, earlier sowing (1 April to 22 April) resulted in lower yield across sites, and this was more pronounced for fast developing genotypes La Trobe, Fathom, Compass and Alestar. Later sowing (1 June to 30 June) at Condobolin (NSW), Hopetoun (WA) and Loxton (SA) also resulted in a lower yield for all genotypes. Knowledge of OFPs based on long-term abiotic stresses will allow breeders to develop genotypes with phenological durations that are pertinent to each location. This will also allow farmers to select sowing dates according to genotype duration and thus minimise the combined risk of frost, heat and water stresses, which collectively should allow yield to approach its maximum potential.

Uncertainty in canola phenology modelling induced by cultivar parameterization and its impact on simulated yield

Identifying Optimal Sowing and Flowering Periods for Barley in Australia: a Modelling Approach

Uncertainty in Wheat Phenology Simulation Induced by Cultivar Parameterization under Climate Warming

Regional Uncertainty Analysis Between Crop Phenology Model Structures and Optimal Parameters

Phenological Development and Grain Yield of Canola As Affected by Sowing Date and Climate Variation in the Yangtze River Basin of China

Genotype × Environment × Management Interactions of Canola Across China: A Simulation Study

Increased Uncertainty in Simulated Maize Phenology with More Frequent Supra-Optimal Temperature under Climate Warming

Evaluation of the Apsim-Wheat Model in Terms of Different Cultivars, Management Regimes and Environmental Conditions

Genotype × Environment Interactions for Phenological Adaptation in Narrow-Leafed Lupin: A Simulation Study with a Parameter Optimized Model

Modelling The Impact Of Climate Variability And Irrigation On Winter Canola Yield And Yield Gap In Southwest China

Combine observational data and modelling to quantify cultivar differences of soybean

How Reliable Are Current Crop Models for Simulating Growth and Seed Yield of Canola Across Global Sites and under Future Climate Change?

Comparisons among Four Different Upscaling Strategies for Cultivar Genetic Parameters in Rainfed Spring Wheat Phenology Simulations with the DSSAT-CERES-Wheat Model

Simulation of environmental and genotypic variations of final leaf number and anthesis date for wheat

Data Requirement for Effective Calibration of Process-Based Crop Models

Estimation of ecotype-specific cultivar parameters in a wheat phenology model and uncertainty analysis

A Model Based Ideotyping Approach for Wheat under Different Environmental Conditions in North China Plain

Comparison Of Five Wheat Models Simulating Phenology Under Different Sowing Dates And Varieties

Uncertainty from Model Structure is Larger Than That from Model Parameters in Simulating Rice Phenology in China

Modelling Maize Phenology, Biomass Growth and Yield under Contrasting Temperature Conditions

Estimating Wheat Grain Yield by Assimilating Phenology and LAI with the WheatGrow Model Based on Theoretical Uncertainty of Remotely Sensed Observation