Mutaome Profiling And Retrospective Mutaome Profiling Using Archived Bone Marrow Smear In Aml

Fang Wang,Wen Teng,Yuehui Lin,Junfang Yang,Xian Zhang,Qing Yin,Xue Chen,Ping Zhu,Chunrong Tong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V122.21.4983.4983

IF: 20.3

2013-01-01

Blood

Abstract:Abstract Background Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease with respect to presentation and clinical outcome. In recent years, more and more somatic mutations and their clinical significance were identified in AML. Most AML patients carry multiple gene mutations and the repertoire of mutations changing during the disease process, which determine the patient's unique clinical manifestations. Herein we recommend using the novel word ”mutaome¡± for representing the repertoire of somatic gene mutations in a specific tumor tissue, and aimed to establish a panel of mutation profiling protocol and retrospective profiling using archived bone marrow smear for clinical use in AML. Methods and Cases Mutation profiling protocol for CEBPA, DNMT3A, FLT3-ITD/TKD, IDH1, IDH2, KIT, NPM1, PHF6 and TET2 by PCR and Sanger sequencing was established, with the detection sensitivity about 15% to 20%. Bone Marrow (BM) or peripheral blood (PB) was collected form patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed. Archived BM smear on glass slides at the time of newly diagnosed were used for retrospective mutation analysis. Results 1) Totally 61 archived smear, 106 fresh BM or PB and 2 paraffin-embedded pathological specimens from 157 patients were analyzed. Age ranged from 1 to 77 years old, with the median age of 27 years old. 2) 60.4% (102/169) samples carrying at least one mutation, 51.0% (53/102) of them carrying 2 or more mutations, 30.4% (31/102) carrying mutations within 2 or more different genes. The number of mutated sample for each gene is 33 for CEBPA¡¢9 DNMT3A¡¢35 FLT3¡¢6 IDH1¡¢7 IDH2¡¢7 KIT¡¢19 NPM1¡¢8 PHF6¡¢and 21 TET2. 3) Paired archived smear and relapsed samples were analyzed for 11 cases, 9 of them showing difference, detailed results shown in Table 1. 4) Totally 53 patients come to our hospital after certain treatment, with the tumor cells below 15% and without AML gene mutation results. For these patients, archived BM smear samples were used for retrospective mutation profiling and then to guide targeted therapy and stratified evaluation. Conclusions Panel testing for gene mutations is effective method for detection of AML molecular markers. For the patients came with partial remission and without gene mutation result, archived bone marrow smear sample can be used for retrospective mutation analysis and then help guiding targeted therapy and stratified evaluation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.