KEYNOTE-181: Phase 3, Open-Label Study of Second-Line Pembrolizumab Vs Single-Agent Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced/metastatic Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Toshihiko Doi,Jaafar Bennouna,Lin Shen,Peter C. Enzinger,Ruixue Wang,Ildiko Csiki,Minori Koshiji,Manish A. Shah
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.tps4140
IF: 45.3
2016-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:TPS4140 Background: Tumors can hijack the PD-1 pathway to suppress immune control. Overexpression of the PD-1 ligand PD-L1 in esophageal cancer may be associated with a poor prognosis. Pembrolizumab (pembro) is a monoclonal antibody that can reinstate the antitumor autoimmune response by blocking the PD-1–ligand interaction. It demonstrated antitumor activity (ORR, 30.4%; DOR, 40 weeks) and was well tolerated in patients with PD-L1+advanced esophageal cancer (phase 1b KEYNOTE-028). The open-label, randomized, phase 3 KEYNOTE-181 trial (NCT02564263) will compare the tumor response to pembro relative to single-agent chemotherapy in previously treated advanced/metastatic (a/m) esophageal cancer. Methods: Key eligibility criteria include age ≥ 18 years, a/m adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus or Siewert type I adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), measurable disease, documented PD during/after first-line therapy, ECOG PS 0-1, no active autoimmune disease or CNS metastases, and provision of a tissue sample for biomarker analysis. HER2 status must be determined for patients with EGJ adenocarcinoma; if HER2+, there must be documentation of PD on trastuzumab-containing therapy. Eligible patients are to be randomized (unblinded) 1:1 to IV pembro 200 mg Q3W or investigator's choice of paclitaxel 80-100 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 Q4W, docetaxel 75 mg/m2 Q3W, or irinotecan 180 mg/m2 Q2W. Treatment is to continue until documented PD, intolerable toxicity, patient/investigator decision, or (for pembro) until 35 cycles (~2 years). AEs are to be monitored throughout treatment and for 30 days thereafter (90 days for serious AEs). Tumor response will be assessed Q9W per RECIST v1.1 and adapted immune-related RECIST (irRECIST; central imaging vendor review). All patients will be followed Q9W for OS until death, withdrawal of consent, or end of study. Primary efficacy end points are PFS (per RECIST v1.1, blinded central imaging vendor review) and OS. Secondary end points include ORR (per RECIST v1.1, blinded central imaging vendor review). Approximately 600 patients will be enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT02564263.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?