Pulse Duration Determines Efficacy of Arrhythmia Termination Via Targeted Optogenetic Stimulation

Patrick M. Boyle,Michael Murphy,Thomas V. Karathanos,Dafang Wang,Sohail Zahid,Kaitlyn N. Whyte,Erica L. Schwarz,Emilia Entcheva,Natalia A. Trayanova
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2015.11.3127
IF: 3.4
2016-01-01
Biophysical Journal
Abstract:Cardiac optogenetics has been envisioned as a pain-free approach for terminating arrhythmia, but questions of clinical feasibility remain unexplored. It remains unknown how advantages of light-based stimulation, such as the ability to induce sustained depolarization in precisely defined tissue regions, might be beneficial in the context of anti-arrhythmic therapy. We used computer simulations to assess the feasibility of terminating reentrant atrial arrhythmias with localized optogenetic stimuli. We conducted simulations in atrial models constructed from MRI scans of three atrial arrhythmia patients. Light sensitization via viral gene delivery of the light-sensitive protein ChR2 was modeled by incorporating a realistic photocurrent model in 40% of atrial tissue (diffuse spatial pattern). In each model, arrhythmia was induced by rapid pacing and the reentrant circuit (RC) was identified using a previously validated approach; then, we simulated placement of blue LED strips along the endocardial surface spanning the narrowest part of each RC (average illuminated area: 38.03mm²). Light-based termination was attempted with four light pulse durations (1-1000ms); to characterize therapeutic reliability, pulse timing was varied in 20ms intervals that spanned the arrhythmia reentrant cycle. Targeted optogenetic stimulation terminated arrhythmia in all three models. The primary mechanism was induction of sustained transmural depolarization in the narrowest part of the RC, which led to conduction block and abrogation of reentry. For each pulse duration tested, at least one timing was successful; however, configurations with longer pulses were more resilient to differences in timing (1000ms pulse: 97.92% success rate; 100ms: 74.68%, 10ms: 55.81%, 1ms: 22.29%). Input energy for optogenetic stimuli was extremely low (average: 7.92mJ/ms) compared to typical defibrillation shocks (∼15J). Long-lasting (≥100ms) optogenetic stimulation via endocardial LED strips is a feasible approach to terminating atrial arrhythmia if the narrowest part of the RC can be targeted.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?