Generation and Screening of Monoclonal Antibodies for Immunopet of Epha2 in Cancer

Sixiang Shi,Hao Hong,Yin Zhang,Stephen Graves,Todd Barnhart,Weibo Cai
2015-01-01
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Abstract:170 Objectives Eph receptor-ephrin signaling is heavily involved in cancer growth and progression. Due to their critical functions and widespread expression in various cancer types, Eph receptor (e.g. EphA2) targeted therapies have become an increasingly important cancer treatment regimen. The goal of this study was to develop an immunoPET tracer for imaging of EphA2 in cancer, which can provide invaluable insights into future optimization of EphA2-targeted therapies. Methods Murine monoclonal antibodies (mAb) against human EphA2 were generated in BALB/c mice, which were screened in EphA2-positive CT-26 colorectal carcinoma cells using flow cytometry. The mAb production method we adopted could readily produce milligram quantities of anti-EphA2 mAbs for in vivo studies. One antibody clone (named as EphA2-mAb) with the highest affinity for EphA2 was selected and conjugated to NOTA for 64Cu-labeling. Receptor competition assays, PET imaging, biodistribution, and histological studies were performed to thoroughly investigate the specificity, tumor targeting efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of 64Cu-NOTA-EphA2-mAb. Results EphA2-mAb exhibited nanomolar affinity for cellular EphA2 on CT-26 cells, and NOTA conjugation did not compromise its EphA2 specificity/avidity based on flow cytometry. 64Cu-labeling was achieved with good yield (>50%) and high specific activity (>1 Ci/μmol). Serial PET imaging of tumor-bearing mice revealed that uptake of 64Cu-NOTA-EphA2-mAb was 9.2±0.9, 10.8±1.7, and 9.9±1.2 %ID/g in EphA2-positive CT-26 tumors at 4, 24, and 48 h post-injection, respectively (n=3), significantly higher than that in EphA2-negative A375 tumors ( Conclusions We have generated the EphA2-mAb de novo. Prominent, persistent, and EphA2-specific uptake of 64Cu-NOTA-EphA2-mAb in EphA2-positive tumors holds strong potential for future cancer diagnosis, patient stratification, and therapy using this or other anti-EphA2 mAbs in clinical development.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?