Abstract:Through media such as newspapers, letterbox flyers, corporate brochures and television we are regularly confronted with descriptions for conventional (bricks 'n' mortar style) services. These representations vary in the terminology utilised, the depth of the description, the aspects of the service that are characterised and their applicability to candidate service requestors. Existing service catalogues (such as the Yellow Pages) provide little relief for service requestors from the burdensome task of discovering, comparing and substituting services. Add to this environment the rapidly evolving area of web services with its associated surfeit of standards, and the result is a considerably fragmented approach to the description of services. It leaves the reality of the Semantic Web somewhat clouded. --------- Let's consider service description briefly, before discussing our concerns with existing approaches to description. The act of describing is performed prior to advertising. This simple fact provides an interesting paradox as services cannot be described exactly before advertisement. This doesn't mean they can't be described comprehensively. By exactly, we are referring to the fact that context provided by a service requestor (and their service needs) will alter the description of the service that is presented to the discoverer. For example, a service provider who operates a cinema wants to describe the price of their service. Let's say the advertised price is $15. They also want to state that a pensioner discount and a student discount is available which provides a 50% discount. A customer (i.e. service requestor) uses the cinema web site to purchase tickets online. They find the movie of their choice at a time that suits. However, its not until some context is provided by the requestor that the exact price is determined. The requestor might state that they are a pensioner. The same is applicable for a service requestor who purchases multiple tickets perhaps on behalf of other people. The disconnect between when the service is described and when a requestor provides context introduces challenges to the description process. A service provider would be ill-advised to offer independent descriptions that represent all the permutations possible for a single service. The descriptive effort would be prohibitive.

Tutorial 3: Models and Languages for Describing and Discovering Eservices

Web-based Application Services Composition for E-Business

Web Services: an Approach to Business Integration Models for Micro-Payment

Business Integration Models in the Context of Web Services

Developing E-Services for Composing E-Services

An Examination On Service Science: A View From E-Service

Definition, Execution, Analysis, and Optimization of Composite E-Services.

Service Language Model: New Ecology for Service Development

Two Main Challenges in Service Description: Web Service Tunnel Vision and Semantic Myopia

Towards Collaborative E-Service.

Representation and Discovery of Intelligent E-Services

An Abstract Model for Service Provision, Search and Composition.

2 Running Case Study : The Amsterdam Times

Web Services Model for Mobile, Distance and Distributed Learning Using Service-Oriented Architecture

Third Party E-Service And Third Party Service-Oriented Architecture

What's in a Service? Towards Accurate Description of Non-Functional Service Properties

Dynamic and adaptive composition of e-services

Countering Service Information Challenges in the Internet of Services

Enriching Descriptions for Public Web Services Using Information Captured from Related Web Pages on the Internet

Understanding the Diversity of Services Based on Users' Identities.

Web Services Oriented Architecture for Electronic Commerce