Uncertainty Quantification of Scientific Proposal Evaluations

Xiaofeng Shi,Peng Wang,Dongbin Xiu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1615/int.j.uncertaintyquantification.2016016198
IF: 1.544
2016-01-01
International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification
Abstract:Peer review is an integral part of safeguarding the fairness of scientific proposal evaluations, but it is also subject to uncertainty, such as reviewer's bias and potential discussion under the table, termed "DaZhaoHu" in Chinese. In this paper, we present a mathematical framework to model the peer review process. Through sensitivity analysis, we numerically demonstrate that the number of proposals has greater impact on overall fairness.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?