Abstract:User comfort in higher-level Automated Vehicles (AVs, SAE Level 4+) is crucial for public acceptance. AV driving styles, characterised by vehicle kinematic and proxemic factors, affect user comfort, with "human-like" driving styles expected to provide natural feelings. We investigated a) how the kinematic and proxemic factors of an AV's driving style affect users' evaluation of comfort and naturalness, and b) how the similarities between automated and users' manual driving styles affect user evaluation. Using a motion-based driving simulator, participants experienced three Level 4 automated driving styles: two human-like (defensive, aggressive) and one machine-like. They also manually drove the same route. Participants rated their comfort and naturalness of each automated controller, across twenty-four varied UK road sections. We calculated maximum absolute values of the kinematic and proxemic factors affecting the AV's driving styles in longitudinal, lateral, and vertical directions, for each road section, to characterise the automated driving styles. The Euclidean distance between AV and manual driving styles, in terms of kinematic and proxemic factors, was calculated to characterise the human-like driving style of the AV. We used mixed-effects models to examine a) the effect of AV's kinematic and proxemic factors on the evaluation of comfort and naturalness, and b) how similarities between manual and automated driving styles affected the evaluation. Results showed significant effects of lateral and rotational kinematic factors on comfort and naturalness, with longitudinal kinematic factors having a less prominent effect. Similarities in vehicle metrics, such as speed, longitudinal jerk, lateral offset, and yaw, between manual and automated driving styles, enhanced user comfort and naturalness. This research facilitates an understanding of how control features of AVs affect user experience, contributing to the design of user-centred controllers and better acceptance of higher-level AVs.

Driving Comfort Evaluation of Passenger Vehicles with Natural Language Processing and Improved AHP

Join driving: A smart phone-based driving behavior evaluation system

Driving Comfort Assessment Model Construction Based On Fuzzy Inference

An Evaluation Model for the Comfort of Vehicle Intelligent Cockpits Based on Passenger Experience

A comprehensive evaluation model for the intelligent automobile cockpit comfort

Research on the Comfort of Vehicle Passengers Considering the Vehicle Motion State and Passenger Physiological Characteristics: Improving the Passenger Comfort of Autonomous Vehicles

Objective Evaluation for the Driving Comfort of Vehicles Based on BP Neural Network

An Evaluation Method for Automated Vehicles Combining Subjective and Objective Factors

User comfort and naturalness of automated driving: The effect of vehicle kinematic and proxemic factors on subjective response

A Driving Posture Prediction Method Based on Driver Comfort

A Comprehensive Evaluation Model of Electric Bus Interior Acoustic Comfort and Its Application

A comfort evaluation method based on an intelligent car cockpit

Can driving condition prompt systems improve passenger comfort of intelligent vehicles? A driving simulator study

Effectiveness Analysis on Human-Machine Information Interaction of Intelligent Highway

A computer-aided driving posture prediction system based on driver comfort

Driving Comfort Simulation Based on Human Biomechanics Model under Vibration

Drivers' Evaluation of Different Automated Driving Styles: Is It Both Comfortable and Natural?

Comprehensive evaluation of ride comfort of trains based on FAHP and GA

A VIRTUAL TEST APPROACH FOR VEHICLE RIDE COMFORT EVALUATION. IN: HUMAN FACTORS IN DRIVING AND TELEMATICS, AND SEATING COMFORT

Intelligent Car Cockpit Comfort Evaluation Model Based on SVM

An Improved Grey Relational Theory Evaluation Method: Considering the Comprehensive Performance of Autonomous Vehicles in Virtual Test