Abstract:Ecological compensation has been adopted in many countries and proved a good approach to protect environment.The focus of ecological compensation study was how to set ecological compensation standard.The ecological compensation standard was assessed mainly based on the methods of market value approach,opportunity cost approach,willingness to pay approach and cost analysis approach.Thus,the ecological footprint(EF) was applied rarely.The EF was defined as the biologically productive land and water a population requires to produce the resources it consumes and to absorb part of the waste generated by fossil and nuclear fuel consumption.The EF provides an aggregate estimate of demands upon the biophysical productivity and waste assimilation capacity of nature imposed by human lifestyles.This aggregate indicator permits the estimation of the equivalent land/sea area,or biosphere,required to support productive activities.Its unique attribute is that it accounts for the demand upon natural resources,in terms of an equivalent land/sea area,or global hectares.The EF method has been proposed as a standard methodology to evaluate the environmental implications of alternative development models.The EF analysis becomes widely adopted as a key environmental indicator of sustainable development. River ecosystem services imply the natural environmental conditions and their effectiveness formed and sustained by river ecosystem and its ecological processes,on which,human life relies of existence.Ecological supply footprint was defined as the enhanced river ecological services′ supply ability caused by the project construction.The enhanced ability was converted to the total biologically productive land/water area.Ecological demand footprint was defined as the weakened river ecological services′ supply ability caused by the project construction.The weakened ability was converted to the total biologically productive land/water area.Five value models(ecological supply footprint models of flooding control,hydropower,reservoir irrigation,improve waterway and reservoir breeding.) of ecological compensation subject and eight loss models(ecological demand footprint models of reservoir sedimentation,reservoir inundation,construction of resettlement area,soil and water erosion,river ecosystem occupied by project,energy consumption of project construction,sewage discharge of project construction,and produce cement and steel.) of ecological compensation object were established based on the idea of ecological footprint on Zaoshi Water Conservancy Project(ZWCP).And the ecological compensation standard of ZWCP was evaluated by the models.The results show that: ① Five ecological supply footprints were 88482.2974 hm2/a in total,which was converted to 6.2353×108Yuan RMB annually.Eight ecological demand footprints were 14946.4861 hm2/a in total,which was converted to 1.0533×108Yuan RMB annually.The values were the losses′ 5.92 times.② Three schemes of ecological compensation standard were proposed,on the premise of identifying the ecological compensation subject and the ecological compensation object.The second scheme was recommended.③ The second scheme of Ecological compensation standard on ZWCP was 0.5238×108 Yuan RMB annually.The central-local government and hydropower development owner were the main ecological compensation subjects,which undertook 52.50% and 35.77% of ecological compensation standard respectively.The resettlements and the river ecosystem were the main ecological compensation object,which obtained 72.16% and 15.68% of ecological compensation standard respectively.

Eco-Compensation Analyses For Drinking Water Reserves Based On Integrated Ecosystem Health Assessment

Quantitative Standard of Eco-Compensation for the Water Source Area in the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Transfer Project in China

[Water Environmental Capacity Calculation Model for the Rivers in Drinking Water Source Conservation Area].

A Quantitative Assessment on Ecological Compensation Based on Water Resources Value Accounting: A Case Study of Water Source Area of the Middle Route of South-To-North Water Transfer Project in China

Ecological Compensation Estimation of Soil and Water Conservation Based on Cost-Benefit Analysis

Studys on Interest Compensation Mechanisms for the Coordination of the Water Resource Utilization

Construction of Ecological Compensation System for Water Environment Resource in Public Places Using Grey Correlation

Multiobjective Optimization for Eco-Compensation Space Selection based on Gross Ecosystem Product

Study on Trans-Boundary Water Quality and Quantity Ecological Compensation Standard: A Case of the Bahao Bridge Section in Yongding River, China

How to measure the ecological compensation threshold in the upper Yangtze River basin, China? An approach for coupling InVEST and grey water footprint

Assessment of the Ecological Compensation Standards for Cross-Basin Water Diversion Projects from the Perspective of Main Headwater and Receiver Areas

Analysis of the factors influencing willingness to Pay and payout level for watershed Eco-compensation of the Huangbai river basin

Discussion on the Eco-Compensation Mechanism for Water Source Protection Area---A Case Study of DianshanLake Area,Shanghai

Accounting of Transboundary Ecocompensation Standards Based on Water Quantity Allocation and Water Quality Control Targets

Framework of basin eco-compensation standard valuation for cross-regional water supply – A case study in northern China

A study on ecological compensation standard for Zaoshi Water Conservancy Project based on the idea of ecological footprint

The Standard Design of Cross-Border Watershed Eco-Compensation Based on Water Quality Agreement Between Upstream and Downstream

Study on Development Process and Mechanism of Ecological Compensation in Beijing and Hebei Province

A Successful Approach of the First Ecological Compensation Demonstration for Crossing Provinces of Downstream and Upstream in China

Identification of Ecological Compensation Zones and Compensation Amounts: A Case Study of the Yellow River Delta

Cross-regional ecological compensation under the composite index of water quality and quantity: A case study of the Yellow River Basin