Mouse Cachectic Skeletal Muscle Mtorc1 Signaling in Response to Acute Eccentric Contractions

Justin P. Hardee,Song Gao,Brandon N. VanderVeen,Dennis K. Fix,Kimbell L. Hetzler,James A. Carson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.30.1_supplement.1009.9
2016-01-01
Abstract:Eccentric contraction (EC) induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy involves the activation of protein synthesis through mTORC1 signaling. Cancer cachexia disruption of muscle protein turnover regulation is well established, but whether increased use regulates suppressed muscle protein synthesis warrants further investigation. We recently demonstrated severely cachectic muscle can initiate a growth response to repeated ECs. However, the EC activation of mTORC1 signaling in cachectic muscle has not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to determine if mTORC1 signaling and protein synthesis in cachectic muscle from 2 distinct preclinical cancer cachexia models could respond to EC. Male, Apc Min/+ (N=5; 15% body weight loss) and Lewis Lung Carcinoma (LLC) tumor‐bearing (N=8; 14% body weight loss) mice performed 1 bout (10 sets of 6 repetitions) of EC and were sacrificed 3h post‐contraction. The left TA performed EC while the right TA served as intra‐animal control. C57BL/6 (WT) mice served as controls. In control muscle Apc Min/+ and LLC mice had decreased muscle mass, p70S6K(T389) phosphorylation, and protein synthesis compared to WT controls. Cachexia did not inhibit the acute EC‐induction of p70S6K(T389) phosphorylation in Apc Min/+ or LLC mice. While EC induced protein synthesis in Apc Min/+ mice, protein synthesis remained suppressed compared to WT mice. Interestingly, EC did not stimulate muscle protein synthesis in LLC mice. Although cachexia suppressed muscle anabolic signaling, cachectic muscle maintains the ability to activate mTORC1 signaling by EC. However, in LLC‐induced cachexia there is a disconnect between mTORC1 activation and the induction of protein synthesis. Further studies are required to determine the tumor specific effects that regulate the anabolic response to eccentric contractions in cachectic muscle. Support or Funding Information Supported by NIH/NCI R01‐CA121249
What problem does this paper attempt to address?