A Comparison of the Analysis of Simple Mediating Effect of the Parametric and Nonparametric Bootstrap Methods
Fang Jie,Zhang Minqiang
2013-01-01
Abstract:It is well known that there are two Bootstrap methods,nonparametric Bootstrap and parametric Bootstrap.The nonparametric Bootstrap method has been widely applied in simple mediation analysis.But the parametric Bootstrap method has not yet been used in simple mediation analysis.In this paper,parametric Bootstrap method was introduced in simple mediation for the first time.After introducing each of the Bootstrap methods in detail,the performance of the two Bootstrap methods in simple mediation was compared.A simulation study was conducted for comparison by means of R software.Two factors were considered in the simulation design;(a) sample size(N=25,50,100,200,1000);(b) parameter combinations(a=b=0,a=.39,b=0,a=0,b=.59,a = b =.14,a=b=.39,a=b=0.59).30 treatment conditions in total were generated in terms of the above 2-factor simulation design.One thousand replications were run for each condition.For each replication in each condition,four Bootstrap methods(bias-corrected and un-corrected parametric percentile residual Bootstrap methods,bias-corrected and un-corrected nonparametric percentile Bootstrap methods) were used to test for simple mediation.For the Bootstrap methods,1,000 bootstrap samples were drawn in each replication.Those methods were compared in terms of(a) type Ⅰ error,(b) power,(c) the coverage of their confidence intervals,and(d) the confidence interval bias.The simulation study found the following results:(1) the behaviors of the bias-corrected Bootstrap method were better than the behaviors of the un-corrected Bootstrap method in type Ⅰ error,the confidence interval coverage,power and the confidence interval bias under the condition of nonzero mediation.However,the bias-corrected Bootstrap method had slightly inflated confidence interval bias under the condition of zero mediation because this method overestimated type I error in some conditions;(2) compared with the nonparametric Bootstrap method,the performances of the parametric Bootstrap method was preferred;the bias-corrected parametric percentile residual Bootstrap method was superior to the bias-corrected nonparametric percentile Bootstrap method in confidence interval bias and Type Ⅰ error.There are three reasons why bias-corrected parametric percentile residual Bootstrap is recommended for testing simple mediating effects.First,the simulation results showed that the overall performance of the bias-corrected parametric percentile residual Bootstrap method was best in different Bootstrap methods.Second,the parametric Bootstrap method can be applicable to all types of mediations.It has a wider applicability than the nonparametric percentile Bootstrap method.Third,the parametric Bootstrap method generates new bootstrap samples using the Monte Carlo method,which further reduces the dependence on the original samples.