Abstract:Background The Pipeline embolization device (PED) is a braided flow diverter that requires a combination of meticulous maneuvers to assure proper device opening and expansion. Mechanical, anatomical, or technical challenges can result in a partially deployed PED with failed expansion. Methods We retrospectively reviewed a prospective, single-center aneurysm database to identify all patients who underwent endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the PED with the Navien distal intracranial catheter access platform. Cases requiring PED deployment within the Navien catheter were reviewed. Data were collected for patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, and technical details of the interventional procedure. Results Eleven PED neurointerventions requiring intra-Navien PED deployment to fully open the PED were identified. Mean patient age was 55.5 ± 9.9 years (range 37–76 years). Mean aneurysm size was 12.5 mm ± 4.9 mm (range 2–42 mm). All aneurysms were located in the anterior circulation (ACA, n = 1; supraclinoid, n = 1; ophthalmic/paraophthalmic, n = 6; cavernous, n = 3; petrocervical, n = 1). Mean fluoroscopy time was 67.1 ± 20.5 min. Intra-Navien technique was used to open the proximal PED (n = 7) and the mid portion (n = 4). Post-processing of the PED with a balloon was used in 6 cases. Figure 1 illustrates a case example of intra-Navien PED deployment in a 6mm supraclinoid ICA aneurysm. (A) Arch aortogram (AP view), demonstrates type 2 arch. (B) 3-dimensional reconstruction of the 6mm supraclinoid ICA aneurysm (lateral view). (C-G) Intra-procedural native single-shot fluoroscopy lateral views of PED deployment where the stretched segment could not be opened by standard maneuvers. Black arrow = tip of Navien, white arrow = Marksman tip, black arrowhead = constrained segment of the device. (H) Lateral view demonstrates complete unsheathe of PED within the Navien. (I) Lateral view shows opening of the constrained segment using the intra-Navien technique with simultaneous unsheathe of the Navien while pushing on the Marksman. White arrowhead = previously constrained segment now opened with intra-Navien PED deployment. (J) Lateral view demonstrates completely deployed PED, widely open. (K) Lateral cine view demonstrates good vessel wall apposition of the device. (L) Final control DSA demonstrates significant contrast stasis in the aneurysm. Conclusion In circumstances when a partially deployed PED remains constrained despite exhaustion of standard maneuvers to facilitate opening, the technique of intra-Navien PED deployment is a valuable rescue strategy. This novel alternative method of PED deployment can be used to open a stretched device with successful completion of the PED implantation. Disclosures L. Lin: None. G. Colby: 2; C; Covidien and MicroVention. B. Jiang: None. N. Nundkumar: None. J. Huang: None. R. Tamargo: None. A. Coon: 1; C; Covidien. 2; C; Covidien and Stryker. 6; C; Proctor for Pipeline, Surpass, and FRED.

E-054 Initial Procedural Outcomes in 20 Consecutive Pipeline Flex Cases: the First American Series

Immediate Procedural Outcomes in 44 Consecutive Pipeline Flex Cases: the First North American Single-Center Series

Declining Complication Rates with Flow Diversion of Anterior Circulation Aneurysms after Introduction of the Pipeline Flex: Analysis of a Single-Institution Series of 568 Cases

47 Consecutive Cases of Pipeline Flex Flow Diversion Utilizing a Novel Large-Bore Intracranial Intermediate Catheter: Nuances and Institutional Experience with the Syphontrak

Pipeline Embolization for Salvage Treatment of Previously Stented Residual and Recurrent Cerebral Aneurysms

Predictors of occlusion, long-term outcomes, and safety in a cohort of 674 aneurysms treated with the Pipeline embolization device

No Delayed Ruptures on Long-Term Follow-Up of a Case Series of Persistently Filling Saccular Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms After Flow Diversion With the Pipeline Embolization Device

Safety and effect of pipeline flex embolization device for complex unruptured intracranial aneurysms

Multicenter Experience with the Pipeline Flex and Vantage with Shield Technology for Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment

Pipeline Embolization Device for the Treatment of Ruptured Intracerebral Aneurysms: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Short-term outcome following treatment of intracranial aneurysms with pipeline embolization device

Vanguard Study: Initial experience with the new fourth generation Pipeline Vantage Flow Diverter (PVFD): 6-month results, technical and clinical considerations

Angiographic and clinical outcomes from 396 aneurysms treated with the pipeline flex embolization device with shield technology

Treatment Outcome of Flow Diverter Device for Medium-Sized Cerebral Aneurysms: A Single-Center Report

Flow diversion using the Pipeline embolization device for intracranial and extracranial pseudoaneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

Fourth-generation PipelineTM Vantage flow diversion: First reported US experience of safety and feasibility

Radiation Dose Analysis of Large and Giant Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm Treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device Versus Traditional Coiling Techniques

Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) and Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device (FRED) for Intracranial Aneurysms; A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study

Flow diversion for the treatment of posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms: a novel classification and strategies

E-089 intra-navien deployment of the pipeline embolization device: a novel rescue strategy for failed device expansion

Flow Diverter Combined with Coil Embolization for Acutely Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single Center Experience