Abstract:Compared with financial information, whether corporate social responsibility disclosure has impacts on debt financing cost has obviously become a heated topic in the academic. This paper selects A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets of China from 2013 to 2017 as sample to study the impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure on debt financing cost, including bond financing cost and bank loan cost. In addition, this paper divides the sample into voluntary corporate social responsibility disclosure group and mandatory corporate social responsibility disclosure group and studies whether the effects of voluntary corporate social responsibility disclosure and mandatory corporate social responsibility disclosure on bond financing cost and bank loan cost are different. The empirical results are presented as follows: Firstly, enterprise disclosing high-quality corporate social responsibility report is more conducive to reducing the debt financing cost. Specifically, corporate social responsibility disclosure significantly lowers both the bond financing cost and bank loan cost. Moreover, the reduction impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure on bond financing cost is greater than that of bank loan cost. Secondly, enterprises voluntarily disclosing corporate social responsibility reports are more conducive to reducing the debt financing cost than that of enterprises mandatorily disclosing corporate social responsibility reports. Thirdly, non-state-owned enterprises are more conducive to reducing debt financing cost than that of state-owned enterprise. The enterprises with more market competition are more conducive to reducing the debt financing cost than the oligopolistic enterprises. Finally, this paper concludes and gives policy implications. This paper amplifies the literature regarding the economic consequences of corporate social responsibility disclosure and improves the understanding of the impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure on debt financing cost.

Loan Guarantees and the Cost of Debt: Evidence from China

The Effect of Ownership Structure on Leverage Decision: New Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

Leverage Ratio and Determinants of Capital Structure in SMEs: Evidence from China

Loan Guarantees and Guarantor Default Risk: Evidence from China

Ownership Structure and the Cost of Debt: Evidence from Chinese Corporate Bond Market

Separation of Ownership and Control for Chinese Listed Firms: Effect on the Cost of Debt and the Moderating Role of Bank Competition

Controlling Shareholders' Ownership and Loan Guarantees to the Related Parties

Loan Guarantees, Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Audit Fees: Evidence from China

Loan guarantees and guarantors' accounting conservatism: evidence from China

Can't Debt Come into Play Governance Effect Really?The New Evidence Based on the Listed Real Estate Companies in China

Ownership, Institutions, and Capital Structure: Evidence from China

Corporate social responsibility and debt financing cost: evidence from China

Debt of Bank, Institutional Environment and the Agent Cost of Controlling Shareholder

A Study on the Relationship between External Guarantees and Cost of Debt——Based on the Perspective of Audit Opinion's Moderating Effects

Family Control and Cost of Debt: Evidence from China

Does State Ownership Really Matter in Determining Access to Bank Loans? Evidence from China's Partial Privatization

The effect of corporate governance on debt financing cost of listed companies

Mixed ownership reform and the short-term debt for long-term investment of non-state-owned enterprises: Evidence from China

Guaranty Funds, Government Shareholding and Risk Taking: Evidence from China

Local government financing vehicle restructuring, implicit government guarantees and debt financing costs: Evidence from the Chinese municipal corporate bond market

Corporate Ownership, Debt, and Expropriation: Evidence from China