Abstract:The current study argues that the capitalisation effect of urban public facilities on housing will be considerable when the accessibility or availability of facilities has a serious stake in the location or property rights of houses. The supply level and supply quantity of urban public facilities determine whether there is a significant difference in the accessibility or availability of facilities amongst neighbourhoods, and subsequently determines whether the capitalisation effect of facilities on surrounding houses is considerable, which ultimately affects the spatial inequality in housing prices (i.e. spatial dispersion of housing prices). However, previous studies have rarely considered the fact that the supply and demand of urban public facilities vary with the type of facilities. Thus, according to the law of diminishing marginal utility, the current study proposes a theoretical framework for the impact of the allocation of urban public facilities at different supply levels on the spatial inequity in housing prices and verifies this through a case study. Results indicate that the difference in urban public facility allocation caused by the unequal supply quantity or unbalanced spatial distribution has a notable impact on the spatial inequality in housing prices. There are three states of allocation of urban public facilities available according to different supply levels, namely, disequilibrium, quantitative equilibrium and spatial equilibrium:(І) Scarce and high-quality public resources that may always be in the disequilibrium state create a substantial capitalisation effect on nearby housing, and their presence will aggravate spatial inequality in housing prices; (П) Public facilities that can only reach the quantitative equilibrium state have a considerable capitalisation effect on nearby housing, and their supply densities have a positive impact on the spatial inequality in housing prices; (Ш) Public facilities in the spatial equilibrium state have a negligible capitalisation effect on nearby housing, and their supply densities have a negative impact on the spatial inequality in housing prices. Therefore, it is reasonable to argue that urban public facilities at different supply levels have a diversified impact on the housing market. This study can contribute to having a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of the diversified impact of urban public facilities on the housing market.

The Heterogeneity of Market Supply Effects of Public Housing Provision: Empirical Evidence from China

Prosperity and Inclusion: the Impact of Public Housing Supply on Urban Inclusive Growth in China

Exploring the Coordination Mechanism for Public Housing Supply with Urban Growth Management: A Case Study of Chongqing, China

The Reform of Housing Allocation System in Urban China and Its Allocation Effects

Housing Price, Consumption, and Financial Market: Evidence from Urban Household Data in China

Explaining Inter-Metropolitan Variation in Housing Rents in China

Effects of Affordable Housing Land Supply on Housing Prices: Evidence from 284 Cities in China

Subsidized Credit Supply and the Housing Market: Evidence from the Housing Provident Fund System in China

Mismatches between the Supply and Demand of Public Rental Housing in Chinese Cities

Does the Difference in Urban Public Facility Allocation Cause Spatial Inequality in Housing Prices? Evidence from Chongqing, China

Nonlinear Influence of Public Services on Urban Housing Prices: A Case Study of China

Research on the economic effects of housing support expenditures under the perspective of consumption heterogeneity: Evidence from China

Development of Public Housing in Post‐reform China

Housing Choice Behavior of Urban Workers in China's Transition to a Housing Market

Comparative Measurement on the Herding Effect in Housing Market of China——an empirical study based on China's provincial dynamic panel data model

LAND SUPPLY AND CAPITALIZATION OF PUBLIC GOODS IN HOUSING PRICES: EVIDENCE FROM BEIJING

Governmental Public Goods Provision on Housing Price and Household Consumption

Tenure Inequality, Public Facilities and Housing Prices: Evidence from Shenzhen, China

The Downside of Marketization: a Multilevel Analysis of Housing Tenure and Types in Reform-Era Urban China.

An Analysis of Housing Policy During Economic Transition in China

Separating the consumption and investment demands for housing: Evidence from urban China