A Randomized Controlled Study on Deep Vein Thrombosis after Total Hip Arthroplasty

王峰,姚晨,史冬泉,陈东阳,邱旭升,徐志宏,袁涛,翁文杰,蒋青
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2010.04.012
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the incidence rate and prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods From May 2007 to December 2008, 141 patients with THA underwent deep vein anterograde venagraphy of lower limb in order to find the location, size and num-ber of thrombus. There were 53 males and 88 females in our study. The patients ranged from 17 to 86 years old, with an average age of (63.20±13.78) years. The patients were randomly divided into anticoagulation group and non-anticoagulation group according to the use of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or not. There were 82 patients in non-anticoagulation group and 59 ptients in non-anticoagulation group. The diag-nosis of DVT was according to the criterion recommended by Rabinov and Paulin in 1972, combining with the experience of the civil scholars. Depending on the finding of deep vein anterograde venography, the DVT was classified into proximal type, distal and mixed ones. Results The incidence rate of DVT after THA was 32.62% (46 patients). There were proximal DVT in one case, mixed DVT in two cases, distal DVT in 43 cases. Thirty-four patients (73.9%) had not obvious clinical signs and symptoms. There was no difference in incidence rate between the non-anticoagulation group (59 patients) and anticoagulation group (82 patients). Conclusion The incident of DVT after THA can be found accurately by digital lower limb venography technology. There is no direct relation between clinical DVT and clinical evidence. LHMN can decrease the incident rate, but there is no statistical significance. It is necessary to adopt individual thromboembolism prophylaxis measures.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?