Abstract:The notion of common sense is invoked so frequently in contexts as diverse as everyday conversation, political debates, and evaluations of artificial intelligence that its meaning might be surmised to be unproblematic. Surprisingly, however, neither the intrinsic properties of common sense knowledge (what makes a claim commonsensical) nor the degree to which it is shared by people (its "commonness") have been characterized empirically. In this paper, we introduce an analytical framework for quantifying both these elements of common sense. First, we define the commonsensicality of individual claims and people in terms of the latter's propensity to agree on the former and their awareness of one another's agreement. Second, we formalize the commonness of common sense as a clique detection problem on a bipartite belief graph of people and claims, defining [Formula: see text] common sense as the fraction [Formula: see text] of claims shared by a fraction [Formula: see text] of people. Evaluating our framework on a dataset of [Formula: see text] raters evaluating [Formula: see text] diverse claims, we find that commonsensicality aligns most closely with plainly worded, fact-like statements about everyday physical reality. Psychometric attributes such as social perceptiveness influence individual common sense, but surprisingly demographic factors such as age or gender do not. Finally, we find that collective common sense is rare: At most, a small fraction [Formula: see text] of people agree on more than a small fraction [Formula: see text] of claims. Together, these results undercut universalistic beliefs about common sense and raise questions about its variability that are relevant both to human and artificial intelligence.

An Introduction to Commonality of Knowledge

Extremes Meet:Between Local Knowledge and Universal Knowledge

The Epistemology in Kant's Pre-Modern Western Aesthetics

The Expansion of Epistemology: the Metaphysical Vs. the Practical Approach

Expression Object-Oriented of Universal Logic

Moral Knowledge and Ethic Objectivity

New Common sense philosophy of Ordinary language analysis——On Neo-Moorean

From Kant to Xiong Shili:“a Debate of Knowledge and Wisdom”

Compatibility and Tensions Between Transcendental Idealism and Common-Sense Realism — Husserl and McDowell

A framework for quantifying individual and collective common sense

Knowledge, Morals and the Modernization of Traditional Confucianism

On Husserl's Transcendental Phenomenology and the Western Traditional Subjectivism

Epistemic Logic over Similarity Graphs: Common, Distributed and Mutual Knowledge

On the Main Trend of the Western Theory of Knowledge in Ancient Time——The Exploration of Plato,Cicero and Augustine into Knowledge

Mind and epistemic constructivism: Wang Yangming and Kant

Epistemology with the Guidance of Interests——Research on the Characteristics of Habermas's Epistemology

Re-examining the Question:“Who do We Need, Kant or Hegel”

On the Metaphysical Foundation of Kant's Doctrine of Right

Are There Contingent A Priori Propositions and Necessary A Posteriori Propositions(Part I)——A Critique of Kripke's Theory of Knowledge

Study of Contingent Priori Truth:Progress from Kant to Kripke

Understanding,Critique and Constitution