Re-discussion on the necessity and surgical indication of extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer

Hong-wei YAO,Wen-di LI,Yin-hua LIU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7504/CJPS.ISSN1005-2208.2014.09.04
2014-01-01
Abstract:The extralevator abdominoperineal excision(ELAPE)through the anatomical plane outside the levator meets with the holy plane of total mesorectal excision to ensure the integrity of the surgical specimen. The rates of positive circumferential resection margin and intra-operative perforation were decreased by extended resection of levator. In recent years, in the field of colorectal surgery a debate was risen that if ELAPE can replace abdominoperineal resection(APR). How to determine the indication of ELAPE? How to improve perineal incision complications of ELAPE? And howto determine the survival benefit of ELAPE? Along with the related research, ideas gradually clear. For low rectal cancers taging cT1-2 or ycT0-2, APR procedure is still the standard operation. In the absence of a high level of evidence based medicine, it's too early to say that ELAPE can replace APR.Tumor staging ycT3-4 after neoadjuvant treatment is moresuitable for ELAPE. The reduction of local recurrence rate and benefit of long-termsurvival is looked forward to.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?