Abstract:To define East Asia’s cultural identity as several specific cultural factors is to recognize East Asian culture as objects of ideas, ideals, imagination, and fiction, not as entities that exist. However, it is not right to deny the existence of East Asian universal culture and common culture because of the fact that East Asian culture cannot be explained by several specific factors. It can never be right to deny even the facts that exist not to see East Asia based on ideas and ideals. Literature in classical chinese character, one of the cultural elements of East Asia, is a literary style that began in China and spread throughout East Asia. Therefore, in order to approach East Asian literature in classical chinese character, a balanced perspective between the self and the other is necessary. This is the same in the case of Korean literature in classical chinese character, and accordingly, it is argued that East Asian literature in classical chinese character and Korean literature in classical chinese character should be viewed from a relative perspective, but the practical approach has not yet met this discourse. Researchers of Korean literature in classical chinese character believe that Korean literature in classical chinese character is a literature that emphasizes subjectivity while aiming for chineseization, and that it is a literature that has heterogeneity based on homogeneity with literature in classical chinese character in China and homogeneity based on heterogeneity with literature in classical chinese character in other regions, and aims to establish the status of Korean literature in classical chinese character in East Asia by revealing the contents of exchanges and communication through various contacts. However, these arguments still have many problems to be solved in that most of the leaders of mutual exchange and communication in East Asia do not have a decisive influence in the country’s politics, society, and culture, and the results of exchange and communication have generally resulted in a personal level. Therefore, in order to solve the problem of the status of Korean Literature in Classical Chinese Character in East Asia, it is necessary to reconsider the most essential part of East Asia and Korean Literature in Classical Chinese Character from now on.

Anthology and Sino-literature in Ancient Korea and Japan

Unearthed Documents and Medieval Chinese Literature

Thinking on Methodology in Culture History of Literature in Tang Dynasty

A Text of Historical Documentation: Another View of the Historical Literature in Anthology of Korean Poetry

Anthology and Its Literary Power: Focusing on Poem Titles Edited in Wenyuan Yinghua

From History of Literature and History of Books up to Cultural History of Literature

Essays about Research on Compiling and Writing the History of Chinese Literature

The study of the history of translation in China: A methodological consideration ?With comments on A History of Translation in China

A Few Problems in the Compilation of Chinese Literary History

“Chunjiang huayue ye” in the History of Sinographic Literature in East Asia

On the Use of Analogical Interpretation in Chinese Literary Criticism——The Book of Songs as a Example

Comparative Study of Chinese and Western Literature

A Study of Vernacular Narratives in Modern and Contemporary Chinese Literature

East Asian Discourse and Korean Literature in Classical Chinese character

Korea Bibliography and Its Connection with the Originating Time and Region

Traditional Chinese Poetry and Modern Chinese Literature

On the Philological and Theoretical Value of Wen-hua in the Form of Collective Material Anthology of Critical Essay

On the Relationship between A Classified Anthology of Popular Chinese Poems with Liu Kezhuang and Jianghu Poetic School

Chinese Tradition in the World Literature: Review of Zhang Longxi's A History of Chinese Literature

Comparative Study of the Self-critiques in Novels of Ancient China and Korea——Focus on Strange Stories From a Chinese Studio and Tales of the Nature

Douwe Fokkema's Major Contributions to Comparative Literature and Literary Theory