Meta-analysis of Entecavir and Lamivudine for Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B

YANG Jian-hui,HE Zhi-chao,SU Chen,ZHAO Wen-xia,LI Guo-cheng
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of entecavir versus lamivudine for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients.Methods Published randomized controlled trials(RCTs) of entecavir and lamivudine were identified from Cochrane Library,PubMed,Ovid,Elsevier,CNKI,WANFANG database and VIP.A manual search of references of the included researches was also conducted.Then the quality of the included studies were evaluated,and data were extracted.Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.2 software.If I2 50%,the fixed effect model were applied to analyze the results;while if I2 50%,the random effect model were chosen.Results A total of 27 trials were included in the analysis.Meta-analysis showed that the rate of undetectable HBV DNA,ALT normalization,HBeAg loss and HBeAg seroconversion in entecavir group were obviously higher than lamivudine group.There were no statistical differences in the occurrence of adverse reaction in both groups.Conclusions The current research showed that entecavir was more effective than lamivudine,and the adverse reactions of the 2 drugs were similar.The limited quality of the evidence in the literature underlines the need for future randomized clinical trials in this area.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?