High-pressure Intracoronary Stent Implantation under Intracoronary Ultrasound Guidance

佟子川,崔亮,王乐丰,王红石,邹阳春,葛永贵,倪祝华,徐立,李惟铭,杨新春
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2004.03.004
2004-01-01
Abstract:Objective To determine if stent deployment techniques are improved with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging despite an optimal angiographic result achieved with high-pressure balloon inflation. Methods From Dec. 2000 to Feb. 2002 prospective data were collected on seventy-six patients in whom eighty-four stents were deployed in eighty-four native coronary lesions. All patients were allocated to coronary stent implantation with high inflation pressure and underwent IVUS before and after initial high-pressure dilatation. High-pressure (≥1?215.9 kPa in all cases) balloon inflation were continued until angiographic completion (10% residual stenosis), after which stent apposition, symmetry, and lumen dimension were evaluated with IVUS. If inadequate IVUS result was found, further dilations with higher-pressure or larger balloon and subsequent stent reevaluation with IVUS were performed until criteria for optimal coronary stent implantation were met or dilation pressure reached 2?026.5 kPa. Results Optimal criteria of IVUS were obtained in fourty-nine (58.3%) lesions (NAI group) after initial high-pressure dilatation and intrastent additional higher-pressure dilatation were performed in thirty-five (41.7%) lesions (AI group) whose ultrasound results did not reach the criteria. In patients requiring additional inflations [peak pressure from (1?419±172) kPa to (1?702±172) kPa, P0.001], minimum stent area increased from (7.3±2.0) mm 2 to (9.3±2.0) mm 2 (P0.001) and acute gain increased from 0.71±0.15 to 0.91±0.15 (P0.001)in this group. Conclusion Stent implantation using high-pressure (1?215.9-1?418.6 kPa) technique does not guarantee adequate stent expansion. Additional higher-pressure (1?621.2-2?026.5 kPa) under intracoronary ultrasound guidance can achieve optimizing acute gain, symmetry, and apposition of intracoronary stents in 82.9% of the lesions that meet optimal angiographic criteria but do not meet IVUS standard. Additional higher-pressure (1?621.2-2?026.5 kPa) technique under intracoronary ultrasound guidance is safe and effective.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?