Mammographic features of breast carcinoma: mammographic-pathologic correlation

顾雅佳,周康荣,陈彤箴,王玖华,张廷璆
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:1005-1201.2003.05.013
2003-01-01
Abstract:Objective To analyze the mammographic features of breast carcinoma and the correlation between the mammographic and pathologic findings. Methods A prospective study of 397 consecutive mammograms in patients with breast carcinoma, including infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC, n=297), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and DCIS associated with small invasive foci (n=38), mucinous carcinoma (n=21), medullary carcinoma (n=22) and invasive lobular carcinoma (n=19), was performed to determine the correlations between the mammographic and pathologic findings. Results (1)Microcalcifications appeared in 170 cases (42.8%), a mass in 258 cases (65.0%), and distortion in 33 cases (8.3%), respectively. (2) Microcalcifications were more commonly associated with DCIS and IDC (χ2=30.90, P0.001), and microcalcifications alone were most commonly seen in DCIS (65.8%). (3) Masses were more commonly associated with medullary (90.9%) and mucinous carcinoma (81.0%). The statistically significant difference was seen in comparison with the other types of breast carcinoma (χ2=30.87, P0.001). Masses with microcalcifications (99 cases)appeared in all kinds of breast carcinoma. The number of microcalcification more than 10 or the extent of microcalcification distribution greater than 3 cm was significantly more likely to appear in both DCIS and IDC than in the other types of breast carcinoma (P0.001 and P=0.023 7, respectively). Mass alone appeared in 153 cases, the margins of all types of breast carcinoma were not the same (χ2=27.40, P0.001). (4) Distortion with microcalcifications was only seen mammographically in IDC, and distortion without microcalcifications was seen in both IDC and invasive lobular carcinoma. (5) Grade I and grade Ⅱ IDC were more likely to be associated with distortion (χ2=6.22, P0.05), and grade Ⅲ IDC was more likely to be associated with a mass when findings were seen on mammogram(χ2=7.19, P0.01). Conclusion The common features of breast carcinoma in mammography were microcalcifications, microcalcifications with a mass, a mass, and distortion. IDC was the commonest in breast carcinoma, and could be considered when mammographic malignant features above mentioned were found except the appearance of microcalcifications alone, which was firstly suggestive of DCIS. A mass also appeared in medullary and mucinous carcinoma, and distortion appeared in invasive lobular carcinoma.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?