Comparison of Kissing Dilating by Cutting Balloon and Stenting for Patients with Bifurcated Lesions

陈绍良,段宝祥,叶飞,周陵,林松
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2003.02.011
2003-01-01
Abstract:Objective To determine the effect and feasibility of kissing dilating with cutting balloon and conventional balloon for bifurcated lesions Methods We divided 34 patients with true bifurcated stenosis into cutting ballon group (13 patients) and stenting group (21 patients) Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was performed before and immediately after the interventional procedure Several indexes including minimal lumen diameter, external vessel crossectional area, lumen crossectional area, plaque crossectional area, vessel/lumen diameter and %diameter stenosis were calculated, respectively Results In cutting balloon group, more common lesions were found in left anterior descending artery and first diagonal (43 5% vs 28 9%, P 0 01), less common in right coronary artery and left circumflex (12 1% vs 35 0%, P =0 01), and left ventricular ejection fraction lower (57 6% vs 67 6%, P =0 02), compared with stenting group We deployed 28 stents both in main trunk and side branch vessels, with 7 stents implanted in one vessel only, in stenting patients The maximal dilating pressure was 1?418 55 kPa for stenting and 810 6 kPa for cutting balloon IVUS immediately after procedures demonstrated the final % diameter stenosis in main trunk was 23 6% and 10 8% in stenting and cutting balloon group, respectively ( P =0 01) The external vessel crossectinal area was (10 47±1 25)mm 2 and (12 34±1 38)mm 2 ( P =0 02) No differences were observed in diameter of main trunk and net gain of lumen diameter in both groups The gain of diameter was higher in stenting group than in cutting balloon patients ( P 0 05) The angiographic success rate was 100% for both group patients The procedural time was longer in stenting group than in cutting balloon arm (38 min vs 23 min, P 0 01) Also, stenting procedure was more expensive than kissing by cutting balloon (RMB 70?000 yuan vs RMB 40?000 yuan, P 0 001) Conclusion Kissing technique with cutting balloon and conventional balloon was safe and feasible The procedure was more challengeable, and completed learning curve was necessary for the primary operator
What problem does this paper attempt to address?