Fit and Comparison of Arch Forms among Different Malocclusions

NIE Qiong,LIN Jiu-Xiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1671-167x.2000.02.014
2000-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To compare arch forms among different classified malocclusions. Methods: Measuring the models of normal occlusion and four varying classified malocclusions (Class Ⅰ bimaxillary protrusion, Class Ⅱ 1, Class Ⅱ 2, Class Ⅲ) with three dimension measuring machine, fitting their arch form with conic section. Results: The difference of arch forms among different classified malocclusions was significant, even more, for some malocclusions, the difference of arch forms between upper and lower arches in the same group was significant. Conclusion: In clinical practice bending arch form with simple standard arch form is completely unscientific; different categories of malocclusion and their different pretreatment arch form should be considered to prevent relapse of treatment results. (J Beijing Med Univ, 2000,32:145 148)
What problem does this paper attempt to address?