Comparison of renoprotective effect between angiotensin Ⅱ receptor antagonist and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor on puromycin nephropathy and their possible mechanism

赵雅妮,李惊子,王海燕
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-5403.2002.01.011
2002-01-01
Chinese Journal of Multiple Organ Diseases in the Elderly
Abstract:Objective To investigate the renal protective effect and possible mechanism of inhibiting angiotensin Ⅱ (AngⅡ)in chronic puromycin nephropathy with tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Methods Rats were randomly divided into normal control (NC, n=7), nephrotic syndrome (NS, n=6), NS with irbesartan treatment (n=7), NS with enalapril treatment (n=7) groups. After twelve weeks, serum, urine and renal tissue were collected for study. ED1 positive monocyte/macrophage, osteopontin (OPN), fibronectin (FN), laminin (LN), and α smooth muscle actin (α SMA)were detected by immunohistochemistry of SP method. Collagen was stained with Sirus red. Cells were counted and semi quantitative data were analyzed. Results In angiotensin receptor antagonist (AT1RA) and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) groups, reduced proteinuria, improvement of renal function and lower tubulointerstitial damage index were found. Both AT1RA and ACEI could inhibit ED1 positive cell infiltration, accompanied with down regulation of OPN expression, and reduced extracellular matrix. Conclusions AT1RA and ACEI could reduce monocyte/macrophage infiltration induced by intrarenal Ang Ⅱ, which is associated with their renal protective effects.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?