Abstract:325 Objectives: To investigate the effect of the depth and depth difference of two kidneys measured by the rotation method on the measurement of total and fractional GFR by Gates method and its significance on renal dynamic imaging. Methods: A total of 57 patients undergoing renal dynamic imaging and abdominal CT in our hospital were reviewed retrospectively. The depth and depth difference between the two kidneys were measured by CT, rotation(Figure 1), Tonnesen and Lee formula, and substituted into the Gates formula to obtain total kidney and divided kidney GFR. The values measured by CT were taken as the standard, the paired t-test was used to analyze the differences between the values measured by rotation, Tonnesen and Lee formula with CT. Bland-Altman test was used for consistency analysis. Pearson correlation analysis was performed on the difference in depth and the resulting changes in divided renal function. Results: Compared with CT: ①Tonnesen formula underestimated the total kidney and divided kidney GFR, with statistically significant differences (total kidney: 61.84±22.13vs77.11±27.52, left kidney: 28.52±12.87vs35.93±15.92, right kidney: 33.32±13.82vs41.18±16.91; P 0.05), and the consistency was good. Among them, the bias measured by rotation was the smallest. ②Tonnesen formula underestimated the depth of both kidneys, with statistically significant differences (left kidney: 5.97±0.89vs7.31±1.26, right kidney: 6.01±0.90vs7.28±1.16; P 0.05), and the consistency was good. Among them, the bias measured by rotation was the smallest. ③Tonnesen and Lee formula underestimated the difference between the two kidney depths, and the difference was statistically significant (0.04±0.01 0.07±0.05vs0.41±0.33; P 0.05).(Table 1) ④The depth difference was positively related to the changes in divided renal function (|R(CT) -R (Lee)|) and (|R(Rotation) -R(Lee)|) (R=0.967, 0.702, P<0.05)(Figure 2).As the depth difference increases, it is difficult for Lee formula to precisely show changes in divided renal function. Conclusions: The accurate depth and depth difference of the two kidneys can be obtained by rotation method, so as to improve the accuracy of GFR measurement by Gates method.

Significance of renal dynamic imaging: from the perspective of urology

Significance of Rotational Correction on Renal Dynamic Imaging

Role of renal dynamic scintigraphy for evaluating renal function of related living donors

Renal dynamic imaging in the evaluation and prediction of renal function of living donors

Clinical Value of Renal Dynamic Imaging to Evaluate and Predict the Renal Function of Living Donors

Functional evaluation of transplanted kidneys in normal function and acute rejection using BOLD MR imaging.

The significance of BOLD MRI in differentiation between renal transplant rejection and acute tubular necrosis.

Quantitative assessment of renal functions using 68Ga-EDTA dynamic PET imaging in renal injury in mice of different origins

The clinical value of 99 Tc m-DTPA renal dynamic imaging in evaluating the function of transplanted kidney by GFR after transplantation

Assessment of Renal Fibrosis in a Rat Model of Unilateral Ureteral Obstruction with Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging: Comparison with Α-Sma Expression and 18F-FDG PET

Imaging in Renal Cell Carcinoma Detection

The value of functional magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating renal allograft function

Evaluation of kidney allograft status using novel ultrasonic technologies

A Clinical Study of Using ROC to Compare the Efficiency of ASL and BOLD in Diagnosis of Renal Allograft Function

Image registration in dynamic renal MRI—current status and prospects

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Kidney Injury: Present Status

Radiomics in Kidney Transplantation: A Scoping Review of Current Applications, Limitations, and Future Directions

Sickle cell-related pain: perceptions of medical practitioners.

Radiologic imaging of the renal parenchyma structure and function

A narrative review on the application of artificial intelligence in renal ultrasound

Radiologic evaluation of the kidney transplant donor and recipient