Comparison between Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Conventional Surgery for Multiple Rib Fractures

任守阳,黄健,张晓飞,陈祖尧,王允
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7507/1007-4848.20140010
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare clinical outcomes between video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery(VATS) and conventional surgery for the treatment of multiple rib fractures. Methods A total of 173 consecutive patients with multiple rib fractures were admitted to Dujiangyan People's Hospital from January 2010 to December 2012. There were 122 males and 51 females with their age of 19-71(41.3±7.1) years. According to different treatment strategies,all the patients were divided into 3 groups: conservative treatment group(83 patients with a mean of 4.9±1.3 fractured ribs,including 20 patients with fl ail chest),conventional surgery group(41 patients with a mean of 5.2±1.1 fractured ribs,including 11 patients with fl ail chest) and VATS group(49 patients with a mean of 5.3±1.5 fractured ribs,including 14 patients with fl ail chest). Length of hospital stay,duration of postoperative pain,incision length,operation time,chest drainage duration and morbidity were compared among the 3 groups. Results The incision length(5.2±1.5 cm vs. 8.5±2.3 cm,P=0.031),operation time(1.1±0.3 hours vs. 1.8±0.2 hours,P=0.003),chest drainage duration(0.3±0.0 day vs. 3.2±1.1 days,P=0.007) and length of hospital stay(13.7±1.5 days vs. 17.3±2.3 days,P=0.017) of VATS group were signifi cantly shorter than those of the conventional surgery group. A total of 159 patients were followed up,and chest x-ray was examined at 1,3 and 6 months after discharge. After 3 months,bone callus formation was evident around the rib fractures in chest x-ray in patients undergoing surgery,while bone union with deformity was shown in some patients of the conservative group. Conclusion With the development of various internal fi xation materials,surgical internal fi xation has become a trend for patients with multiple rib fractures,and VATS internal fi xation is minimally invasive with satisfactory clinical outcomes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?