The Clinical Observation of Using Intravenous Anesthesia with Propoful and Misoprostol for Suction Abortion

廖百花,肖小敏
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-9965.2004.02.014
2004-01-01
Abstract:Aim: To study the influence of intravenous anesthesia with propoful and of misoprostol to uterine contraction and blood loss. Methods: The study included 429 pregnant women undergone suction abortion between 45~70 d. Among them 176 cases (group A) received the suction abortion with propoful intravenous anesthesia, and 173 cases (group B) received misoprostol 200 μg before suction abortion with propoful intravenous anesthesia, the other 80 cases (group C) received suction abortion only. Recorded the volume of bleeding, the time for operation , cervical loosen etc. Results: The volume of bleeding in group A was significantly more than that of in group B and C (P=0). Cervix uteri were more looseness in group B than group A and C. After operation, the women who's uterine bleeding was more than 7 d were 28.4% in group A, 18.4% in group B, 12.5% in group C. In group A, there was 35.8% women who's uterine did not contract during operation, but in group B and C, nobody was there. The other items were no significant difference among three groups. Conclusion: The intravenous anesthesia with propoful inhibits uterine contraction and increases blood loss. But administering misoprostol improves (uterine) contraction and decreases blood loss.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?