Abstract:BACKGROUND Sepsis is fatal in patients with gastrointestinal perforation (GIP). However, few studies have focused on this issue. AIM To investigate the risk factors for postoperative sepsis in patients with GIP. METHODS This was a retrospective study performed at the Department of General Surgery in our treatment center. From January 2016 to December 2018, the medical records of patients with GIP who underwent emergency surgery were reviewed. Patients younger than 17 years or who did not undergo surgical treatment were excluded. The patients were divided into the postoperative sepsis group and the non-postoperative sepsis group. Clinical data for both groups were collected and compared, and the risk factors for postoperative sepsis were investigated. The institutional ethical committee of our hospital approved the study. RESULTS Two hundred twenty-six patients were admitted to our department with GIP. Fourteen patients were excluded: Four were under 17 years old, and 10 did not undergo emergency surgery due to high surgical risk and/or disagreement with the patients and their family members. Two hundred twelve patients were finally enrolled in the study; 161 were men, and 51 were women. The average age was 62.98 15.65 years. Postoperative sepsis occurred in 48 cases. The prevalence of postoperative sepsis was 22.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 17.0%-28.3%]. Twenty-eight patients (13.21%) died after emergency surgery. Multiple logistic regression analysis confirmed that the time interval from abdominal pain to emergency surgery [odds ratio (OR) = 1.021, 95%CI: 1.005-1.038, P = 0.006], colonic perforation (OR = 2.761, CI: 1.821-14.776, P = 0.007), perforation diameter (OR = 1.062, 95%CI: 1.007-1.121, P = 0.027), and incidence of malignant tumor-related perforation (OR = 5.384, 95%CI: 1.762-32.844, P = 0.021) were associated with postoperative sepsis. CONCLUSION The time interval from abdominal pain to surgery, colonic perforation, diameter of perforation, and the incidence of malignant tumor-related perforation were risk factors for postoperative sepsis in patients with GIP.

The applications of laparoscopy in upper gastrointestinal perforation

Comparison and analysis of comprehensive curative effect of gastric perforation repair by laparoscope and laparotomy operation

The application of laparoscopic repair to peptic ulcer perforation(Report of 32 cases)

Laparoscopy Versus Laparotomy For Upper Gastrointestinal Perforation In Elderly Patients

The management of duodenal ulcer with acute perforation by laparoscopic surgery

Laparoscopic Gastroduodenal Ulcer Perforation Repair Experience in 22 Cases and Experience

[Application of Laparoscopic Technique in Acute Abdomen of Gastrointestinal Surgery].

Comparative study of transumbilical single hole and double hole laparoscopic repair of peptic ulcer perforation

Validity of laparoscopic surgery for lower gastrointestinal perforations

Experience of management of pediatric upper gastrointestinal perforations: a series of 30 cases

Analysis of the postoperative prognosis of patients with gastric perforation

Risk Factors of Surgical Incision Infection in Patients with Gastrointestinal Perforation

Risk factors for postoperative sepsis in patients with gastrointestinal perforation

ERCP-related upper gastrointestinal perforation:an analysis of 11 cases

[Laparoscopic repair for perforated ulcer]

Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials

Surgical treatment for ERCP related duodenal perforations

Laparoscopic versus open management of duodenal perforation: a comparative study at a District General Hospital

Diagnosis and Treatment of Esophageal Perforation and Disruption 33 Cases Report

Application of laparoscopic technique via transumbilical single incision in abdominal surgery

Laparoscopic Surgery for Penetrating Abdominal Trauma