Abstract:PURPOSE:To compare the treatment effects in patients with maxillary protrusion between implant anchorage and traditional intraoral anchorage. METHODS:Thirty patients with maxillary protrusion treated with bilateral maxillary first premolars extractions and high anchorage were selected. They were randomly divided into implant anchorage group and traditional intraoral anchorage group. Each group had 15 cases. The casts and the cephalograms were obtained before treatment (T1) and after treatment (T2). Three-dimensional model analysis was used to compare the teeth movements between the two groups and cephalometric analysis was used to compare the changes of skeletal and soft tissues. The differences were analyzed with SPSS 17.0 software package. RESULTS:In the implant anchorage group, the upper central incisors were retracted by (6.661±1.328) mm and intruded by (0.129±1.815) mm. In the traditional intraoral anchorage group, the upper central incisors were retracted by (5.788±2.009) mm and extruded by (2.623±1.776) mm. There was no significant difference between the two groups in sagittal movement (P>0.05), but there was significant difference in vertical movement (P<0.05). In the implant anchorage group, the upper first molars were protracted by (0.608±1.045) mm, intruded by (0.608±1.045) mm and moved palatally by (0.477±0.904) mm. In the traditional intraoral anchorage group, the upper first molars were protracted by (1.503±0.945) mm, extruded by (0.072±0.690) mm and moved palatally by (0.883±0.752)mm. There was significant difference between the two groups in sagittal movement and vertical movement (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in horizontal movement(P>0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the changes of cephalometric measurements of skeletal and soft tissues (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Implant anchorage may be superior in vertical control of the maxillary incisors and also superior in sagittal and vertical control of the maxillary molars to traditional intraoral anchorage during management of maxillary protrusion.

Changes in Dental Arch and Hard and Soft Tissue Caused by the Self-Ligating Bracket and Conventional Bracket with Non-Extraction Treatment in Maxillary Mild-to-Moderate Crowding Cases

Non-extraction Treatment with Self-Ligating and Conventional Brackets

Craniofacial Hard and Soft Tissue Changes after Extraction Treatment Using Damon Ⅲ Appliance

[Arch Perimeter Changes on Non-Extraction Correction of Dental Crowding with Damon Appliance].

Root Resorption of Self-Ligating and Conventional Preadjusted Brackets in Severe Anterior Crowding Class I Patients: a Longitudinal Retrospective Study

Retrospective clinical study on maxillary incisor torque with conventional MBT and Damon Q self-ligating brackets in extraction treatment

Changes of maxillary central incisor and alveolar bone in Class II Division 2 nonextraction treatment with a fixed appliance or clear aligner: A pilot cone-beam computed tomography study

Study on the short-term effect of maxillary expansion using self-ligating brackets in patients with cleft lip and palate

A comparative study of changes occurring in the transversal direction of the dental arch in patients suffering from moderate crowding after treatment with three different orthodontic techniques

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes between Miniscrew Implants and Transpalatal Arch Anchorage in Adults with Bimaxillary Dentoalveolar Protrusion

A Comparative Study of Dental Arch Widths: Anterior Crowding and Protrusion

[Comparison of Treatment Results Between Implant Anchorage and Traditional Intraoral Anchorage in Patients with Maxillary Protrusion].

Treatment of Severe Dental Crowding with Microscrew Anchorge

Dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes associated with miniscrew anchorage in customized lingual orthodontics

Indications for Non-Extraction Treatment of Dental Crowding with Damon Appliance

Changes of the Maxillary Dentoalveolar and Dental Arch Produced by the In-Ovation Self-Ligating System During the Leveling and Aligning Phases of Treatment

Changes in the arch width and buccal corridor after fixed orthodontic treatment with Damon self-ligating system: premolar extraction vs. non-extraction

Clinical Effects of Orthodontics Assisted with Anchorage by Combining Microscrew Implants and Transpalatal Arch

The study of effects on the mandibular arch resulted by the application of Mandibular Lip Bumper combined with Twin Block

The Effect of Maxillary and Mandibular Lip Bumper on Teeth and Dental Arch in Late Mixed Dentition

The Study of Soft Tissue Profile Ehanges and the Relationship with the Hard Tissue in the Adult Patients with Bimaxillary Prtrusion Treated with Premolar Extraction and Nance Arch