An Analysis of Prospective Outcome of Surgical Treatment for Extrahepatic Biliary Carcinomas: a Follow-Up Report of 139 Cases

郑树森,秦运升,谢海洋,梁廷波,黄东胜,张珉,王伟林,沈岩,吴健
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-8118.2002.10.008
2002-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the effects of clinical features and therapeutic methods of biliary carcinomas on their prospective outcome and summarize experience in their diagnosis and treatment. Methods The clinical data of 139 patients with extrahepatic biliary carcinomas (gallbladder carcinoma in 88 and bile duct carcinoma in 51) treated in our hospital from January 1992 to July 2000 were retrospectively analyzed. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS10.0 statistical software package. Results Amongst the 139 patients with a mean follow-up duration of 478 days, 78 received resection (radical resection in 43 and palliative resection in 35), but 30 did not. The other 31 were treated by chemo and/or radiotherapy. The overall 5 year survival rate was 5 22%, resectional rate 75% (51/68) and radical resectional rate 33 8% (23/68), respectively, in patients with gallbladder carcinoma. In patients with bile duct carcinoma, they were 21 64%, 70% (28/40) and 50% (20/40), respectively. However, there were no significant differences in these parameters between the two groups of patients (P=0.13). For either gallbladder carcinoma or bile duct carcinoma, the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were remarkably higher in the radical resection group than in palliative resection, internal or external drainage and non operated groups (P0 01). Multivariate analysis revealed that grades, T, N and M of tumor and therapeutic interventions had significantly higher risk ratios. Conclusions The long time survival of the patients with extrahepatic biliary carcinomas is not remarkably improved. With careful patient selection, radical resection may help to improve the prognosis of extrahepatic bile duct neoplasms. To improve the survival, more attention should be paid on early diagnosis and treatment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?