Abstract:Classification approaches have been increasingly applied to differentiate patients and normal controls using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data (RS-fMRI). Although most previous classification studies have reported promising accuracy within individual datasets, achieving high levels of accuracy with multiple datasets remains challenging for two main reasons: high dimensionality, and high variability across subjects. We used two independent RS-fMRI datasets (n = 31, 46, respectively) both with eyes closed (EC) and eyes open (EO) conditions. For each dataset, we first reduced the number of features to a small number of brain regions with paired t-tests, using the amplitude of low frequency fluctuation (ALFF) as a metric. Second, we employed a new method for feature extraction, named the PAIR method, examining EC and EO as paired conditions rather than independent conditions. Specifically, for each dataset, we obtained EC minus EO (EC-EO) maps of ALFF from half of subjects (n = 15 for dataset-1, n = 23 for dataset-2) and obtained EO-EC maps from the other half (n = 16 for dataset-1, n = 23 for dataset-2). A support vector machine (SVM) method was used for classification of EC RS-fMRI mapping and EO mapping. The mean classification accuracy of the PAIR method was 91.40% for dataset-1, and 92.75% for dataset-2 in the conventional frequency band of 0.01-0.08 Hz. For cross-dataset validation, we applied the classifier from dataset-1 directly to dataset-2, and vice versa. The mean accuracy of cross-dataset validation was 94.93% for dataset-1 to dataset-2 and 90.32% for dataset-2 to dataset-1 in the 0.01-0.08 Hz range. For the UNPAIR method, classification accuracy was substantially lower (mean 69.89% for dataset-1 and 82.97% for dataset-2), and was much lower for cross-dataset validation (64.69% for dataset-1 to dataset-2 and 64.98% for dataset-2 to dataset-1) in the 0.01-0.08 Hz range. In conclusion, for withingroup design studies (e. g., paired conditions or follow-up studies), we recommend the PAIR method for feature extraction. In addition, dimensionality reduction with strong prior knowledge of specific brain regions should also be considered for feature selection in neuroimaging studies.

Time Cluster Analysis Method Used in Fmri Data Processing

Clustered Cnmf for Fmri Data Analysis

Clustering Analysis for Fmri Dataset Based on ISODATA Algorithm

Improved Detection of Time Windows of Brain Responses in Fmri Using Modified Temporal Clustering Analysis.

Iterative Temporal Clustering Analysis for the Detection of Multiple Response Peaks in Fmri

Fmri Time Series Analysis Based on Stationary Wavelet and Spectrum Analysis

Time slice analysis method based on OTCA used in fMRI weak signal function extraction

PAIR Comparison Between Two Within-Group Conditions of Resting-State Fmri Improves Classification Accuracy

Time Complexity Optimization of Clustering for Fmri Feature Reconstruction

Investigation of the Components of Signal Detected by Temporal Clustering Analysis in the Cerebral Functional MRI Data Processing

The Method of Analyzing Fmri Data Based on Temporal-spatial Correlation Properties

Derivative temporal clustering analysis: detecting prolonged neuronal activity.

Analysis of dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI time series based on unsupervised clustering methods

An Information-Based Clustering Approach For Fmri Activation Detection

Clustered Pixels Analysis for Functional MRI Activation Studies of the Human Brain

Frequency Clustering Analysis for Resting State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based on Hilbert-Huang Transform.

Intensity Averaging Method Used in Fmri Data Processing

A Novel Method for Spatio-Temporal Pattern Analysis of Brain Fmri Data

Comparison of a non-stationary voxelation-corrected cluster-size test with TFCE for group-Level MRI inference.

Analysis of FMRI data using an integrated principal component analysis and supervised affinity propagation clustering approach.

Comparison of TCA and ICA techniques in fMRI data processing.