The evaluation of radiofrequency coagulation under the guidance of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in treating different branches of portal venous injury: an experimental study
JIAO Zi-yu,LUO Yu-kun,TANG Jie,LIU Qiang,WU Rong,CHEN Ji-ye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2011.09.003
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To discuss the value of radiofrequency coagulation under the guidance of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography(CEUS) in the treatment of portal venous injury. Methods The experiment was performed in 8 healthy swine. Vascular injuries in the segmental and subsegmental branches of portal vein in each animal were created in diameters(d) as followed: d <1 mm, 1 mm≤d<2 mm, 2 mm≤d<3 mm and d≥3 mm, according to which the lesions were assigned into group A, group B, group C and group D. Lesions were treated with radiofrequency coagulation therapy under CEUS guidance. Portal venous flow velocities were recorded before treatment, and volumes of blood flow per minute were calculated then. The duration and efficacy of treatment, area of non-perfusion region under CEUS were recorded 2 h after treatment, and the pathologic examinations were performed two weeks after the treatment. Results Thirty-two lesions in the segmental and subsegmental branches of portal vein were made successfully.The volume of blood flow per minute in groups A, B, C, and D before treatment were (3.9±0.6) mL, (11.9±3.3) mL, (39.2±12.3) mL, and (76.3±21.7) mL, respectively. There were statistical difference among the groups ( F=54.0, P=0.00). And the two-group comparisons, such as groups A and C, groups A and D, groups B and C, groups B and D, groups C and D, were significantly different ( q=7.93, 16.27, 6.13, 14.48, and 8.34, all P<0.05). Hemostasis was effective in all the lesions. The treatment duration in groups A, B, C and D were (98.5±16.8) s, (110.8±24.1) s, (137.2±31.3) s, and (154.5± 39.6) s, respectively. There were statistical differences among the groups ( F=6.01, P=0.00). And the two-group comparisons, such as groups A and C, groups A and D, groups B and D, were significantly different (q=3.75, 5.42, 4.23, all P<0.05). The areas of non-perfusion region under CEUS were (7.4±2.8) cm 2, (11.6±3.1) cm 2, (14.9±4.3) cm 2 and (17.1±4.9) cm 2. There were statistical difference among the groups ( F=9.52, P=0.00). And the two-group comparisons, such as groups A and C, groups A and D, groups B and D, were significantly different ( q=5.48, 7.09, 4.02, all P<0.05). Conclusion The radiofrequency coagulation therapy under CEUS guidance is a fast, convenient and effective hemostatic method in treatment of segmental and subsegmental portal venous injuries of swine.