Clinical and Angiographic Results of Pullback Atherectomy: Effects of Cutter Size and Characteristic of the Lesion

Ruediger Simon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2003.05.009
2003-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the effects of cutter size and characteristic of the lesion on clinical and agiographic results in patients undergoing intracoronary intervention with pullback atherectomy device. Methods Fifty-five patients with a variety of coronary lesions, including 17 in-stent restenosis lesions, were selected to receive pullback atherectomy treatment. Quantitative coronary angiography data were obtained before and after the intervention, and follow-up angiography was conducted at the end of 6 months. Results The device success rate was 95%. The maximal luminal diameter gain was (0.91±0.59)mm by PAC. Angiographic complications after PAC included any dissection in 7, and abrupt closure in 1. The binary angiographic restenosis rate at the end of 6 months was 27%. As compared with 2.0 mm cutter, patients with 2.4 mm cutter had higher maximal luminal diameter gain (0.94±0.51 mm vs 0.87±0.70 mm,P=0.681), and less luminal diameter loss (0.57±0.59 mm vs 0.81±0.78 mm,P=0.231) during follow-up angiography. Patients with eccentric lesion had higher maximal luminal diameter gain (1.13±0.53 mm vs 0.64±0.56mm,P=0.002) after PAC, but with comparable minimal luminal diameter (1.97±0.65 mm vs 1.97±0.70 mm, P0.05) and binary restenosis rate (24% vs 30%, P0.05) during follow-up angiography. Conclusion Pullback atherectomy is an effective method of plaque removal for coronary artery disease with optimal short-term angiographic results, and large cutter and eccentric lesion seem to come with good immediate and follow-up angiographic results.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?