Meta-Analysis of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Enzyme Immunoassays for Diagnosis of Clostridium Difficile Infection

廖雯斐,王红玲,李婷,齐健,曾凡义
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14188/j.1671-8852.2013.06.012
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the accuracy and sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction(PCR)and enzyme immunoassays(EIAs)in detecting clostridium difficile infection(CDI).Methods:A comprehensive network search is performed to retrieve relevant studies on PCR and EIAs in the detection of clostridiumdifficile.Data were extracted and analyzed using software Meta-disc1.4.Results:In 767 relevant studies,9 studies were enrolled and 2 855 patients were included.Heterogeneity(except for threshold effect)was found within these studies.A meta-analysis was performed using the random effect model.The result showed sensitivity,specificity,positive likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio in PCR and EIAs were 92%(89%-95%)vs.70%(65%-75%),97%(97%-98%)vs.97%(96%-97%),37.37(20.54-67.99)vs.30.38(13.64-67.63),and 451.29(202.21-987.66)vs.161.20(46.84-554.74),respectively.The areas under summary receiver operating characteristics curve(AUC)were 0.980 7 and 0.968 7,and the Q indices were 0.934 8 and 0.917 8 for PCR and EIAs,respectively.Conclusion:Compared with EIAs,PCR has a higher accuracy in detecting CDI.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?