Abstract:Objective: The current study aimed to explore the efficacy of Zero profile intervertebral fusion system (Zero-P) and traditional anterior plate cage system (PC) in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Further, the present study evaluated effects of the treatments on medical security, height of intervertebral disc, adjacent-level ossification development (ALOD), and adjacent segmentation disease (ASD) through a systematic retrospective analysis. Methods: Studies on Zero-P system and traditional anterior plate cage system for ACDF in the treatment of CSM were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Two independent researchers screened articles, extracted data, and evaluated the quality of the articles based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the current study. RevMan5.3 software was used for meta-analysis following the guidelines of Cochrane collaboration network. Cervical curvature, interbody fusion rate, preoperative and postoperative disc height index (DHI), fusion cage sinking rate, postoperative dysphagia, ASD, ALOD, and loosening of screw were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 17 literatures were included in the present study, including 6 randomized controlled trials and 11 observational studies. The studies comprised a total of 1204 patients with CSM, including 605 patients in the Zero-P system group (Zero-P group) and 599 patients in the traditional animal plate cage group (PC group). Results of this meta-analysis showed that postoperative dysphagia [OR = 0.40, CI (0.28, 95% 0.58), P < 0.00001], ALOD [OR = 0.09, CI (0.02, 95% 0.39), P = 0.001], ASD [OR = 0.42, CI (0.20, 95% 0.86), P = 0.02], and screw loosening [OR = 0.20, CI (0.08, 95% 0.52), P = 0.0009] of the Zero-P group were significantly lower compared with the PC group. On the other hand, preoperative cervical curvature [WMD = -0.23, CI (-1.38, 95% 0.92), P = 0.69], postoperative cervical curvature [WMD = -0.38, CI (-1.77, 95% 1.01), P = 0.59], cage sinking rate [OR = 1.41, CI [0.52, 95% 3.82], P = 0.50], intervertebral fusion rate [OR = 0.76, CI (0.27, 95% 2.48), P = 0.38], preoperative DHI [WMD = -0.04, CI (-0.14, 95% 0.22), P = 0.65], and postoperative DHI [WMD = 0.06, CI (-0.22, 95% 0.34), P = 0.675] were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion: It was evident that the Zero-P system used in ACDF is superior compared with the traditional anterior plate cage system in postoperative dysphagia, avoiding ALOD, ASD, and screw loosening.

Comparison Study of Cervical Single Segment Zero-P System with Traditional Anterior Decompression and Fusion

Application Of Zero-P On Anterior Cervical Decompression And Bone Fusion

Effectiveness comparison of Zero-profile interbody fusion implant and anterior cervical plate interbody fusion device: a clinical and radiological study

Zero-Profile Versus Cage and Plate in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for the Treatment of single- level Traumatic Cervical Disc Herniation: A Minimum of Three-Year Follow-Up Study

The Application Of Zero-Profile Implant In Two-Level And Single Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy And Fusion For The Treatment Of Cervical Spondylosis: A Comparative Study

Comparison Of Anterior Cervical Discectomy And Fusion With The Zero-Profile Implant And Cage-Plate Implant In Treating Two-Level Degenerative Cervical Spondylosis

Clinical and Radiological Comparison of the Zero-Profile Anchored Cage and Traditional Cage-Plate Fixation in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

The Efficiency of Zero-profile Implant in Anterior Cervical Discectomy Fusion

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Zero-P System for Treatment of Cervical Spondylosis: A Meta-Analysis

The Efficiency of Zero-Profile Implant in Anterior Cervical Discectomy Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Long-term Follow-up Study.

Zero-Profile Versus Cage and Plate in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with a Minimum 2 Years of Follow-Up: A Meta-Analysis.

Outcome Evaluation of Zero-Profile Device Used for Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Osteoporosis Compared Without Osteoporosis: A Minimum Three-Year Follow-Up Study

Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with the Zero-Prbfile Device Versus Plate and Cage in Treating Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Comparison Of The Incidence Of Post-Operative Dysphagia Between Anterior Cervical Discectomy And Fusion With The Zero-Profile Implant System And With The Traditional Anterior Plate

Comparison of 2 Zero-Profile Implants in the Treatment of Single-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Preliminary Clinical Study of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Fusion.

The Primary Clinical Application of Zero-p Anterior Cervical Intervertebral Fusion System for Cervical Intervertebral Fusion

Can Zero-Profile Cage Maintain the Cervical Curvature Similar to Plate-Cage Construct for Single-Level Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion?

Three-Level Anterior Cervical Decompression And Fusion Using The Zero-Profile Implant System

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with zero-profile versus stand-alone cages for two-level cervical spondylosis: A retrospective cohort study

Zero-profile Interbody Fusion Device Versus Plate Cage Benezech in the Treatment of Single-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Comparison of the Postoperative Motion Stabilization Between Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion with a Zero-Profile Implant System and a Plate-Cage Construct.