Diagnostic value of type-B ultrasonography,T-Tube cholangiography and electronic choledochoscopy to retained bile duct stones

刘蔚东,张阳德,何剪太,万小平,李年丰,龚连生,刘恕
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2004.07.006
2004-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the diagnostic methods to retained bile duct stones after surgery. Methods: The records with type-B ultrasonography, T-Tube cholangiography and electronic choledochoscopy were retrospectively analyzed on 167 cases for cleaning the retained bile duct stones with choledochoscopy, and their diagnostic validity rate and diagnostic effect were compared. Results: The diagnostic validity rate, false positive rate, false negative rate of type-B ultrasonography, T-Tube cholangiography and electronic choledochoscopy was 84.5%, 5.6%, 9.9%, 74.6%, 1.4%, 23.9%,98.6%, 0, 1.4%, respectively. But there were no significant difference in diagnostic effect between electronic choledochoscope and Type-B Ultrasonography(P=0.791), electronic choledochoscope and T-Tube cholangiography(P=0.457). Conclusions: Each had his advantages in three diagnostic methods. Type-B ultrasonography can find the retained stones position and amounts, bile duct dilation. T-Tube cholangiography can find the retained stones, bile duct stricture and duct drainage. Electronic choledochoscopy can find directly the retained stones, tumor, stricture, inflammation, bleeding and the missed out stones by type-B ultrasonography and T-Tube cholangiography. At the same time the found stones can be cleaned during choledochoscopy. Three methods exerted their powers in diagnosing the retained bile duct stones after surgery and cannot be substituted with each other. It suggested that threemethods should be used routinely in order to ultimately reduce the retained stones rate after surgery.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?