Effects of laparoscopic management for hydrosalpinx on ovarian responses to superovulation induction during in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer
朱湘虹,孙海翔,胡娅莉,葛春晓
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2006.04.009
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate effects of different laparoscopic procedures for hydrosalpinx on ovarian responses to superovulation induction during in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer(IVF-ET).Methods A total of 65 patients with infertility derived from hydrosalpinx underwent 67 cycles of IVF-ET from January 2002 to January 2005.Before the IVF-ET,the patients were given bilateral laparosocpic salpingectomy(Group A,n=47,48 cycles) or laparosocpic proximal tubal ligation and distal tubal salpingostomy(Group B,n=18,19 cycles).Another 58 patients with proximal tubal occlusion without hydrosalpinx were simultaneously included for 58 cycles of IVF-ET(Group C).Results The fertilization rates,cleavage rates,implantation rates,and clinical pregnancy rates were 85%±21%,95%±17%,49%(55/113),and 79%(38/48) in the Group A,83%±17%,98%±7%,47%(21/45),and 68%(13/19) in the Group B,and 81%±22%,92%±16%,41%(57/140),and 66%(38/58) in the Group C,respectively,without statistically significant difference among the 3 groups(F=0.48,P=0.620;F=1.22,(P=0.297);χ~2=1.691,P=0.429;χ~2=2.471,P=0.291).The doses of gonadotrophin,the duration of stimulation,and the number of retrieved oocytes were 29.4±10.3 vials,9.4±1.7 d,and 11.4±5.6 in the Group A,24.7±7.7 vials,9.0±1.8 d,and 12.8±6.1 in the Group B,and 28.4±8.8 vials,9.1±1.8 d,and 11.4±5.3 in the Group C,respectively,without statistically significant difference among the 3 groups(F=1.77,P=0.174;F=0.52,P=0.593;F=0.51,P=0.599).Conclusions Laparosocpic salpingectomy or laparosocpic proximal tubal ligation with distal tubal salpingostomy for hydrosalpinx does not impair ovarian responses to the superovulation induction.Both of the procedures may be considered for the treatment of hydrosalpinx prior to IVF-ET.