Effect of sodium salicylate on the paraquat-exposed rats with lung injury

Jie QIAN,Xiao-ye LU,Chang-qing ZHU,Li-xiong L(U)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16571/j.cnki.1008-8199.2014.02.015
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective Paraquat,as a widely used contact herbicide,is a strong pneumotoxicant. This study is to investigate the effects of sodium salicylate( NaSAL) on paraquat-exposed rats through observation of the 28-day survival rate and pathological changes in the lungs of the rats. Methods Fifty-nine Wistar rats were randomly divided into six groups: normal control,NaSAL control,paraquat A,paraquat B,paraquat + NaSAL A,and paraquat + NaSAL B. The rats in the normal and NaSAL control groups were intraperitoneally injected with saline and NaSAL at 300 mg / kg,those in paraquat A and B with paraquat at 25 and 35 mg / kg,and those in paraquat + NaSAL A and B with the same doses of paraquat followed 2 hours later by intraperitoneal injection of NaSAL at 200 and 300 mg / kg,respectively. Then all the rats were observed for pathological changes in the lungs and the rate of survival for 28 days. Results Acute lung injury was observed at 4 days in the paraquat groups,but not in the normal and NaSAL control groups. The paraquat + NaSAL groups showed no significant improvement in lung injury as compared with the paraquat groups. Masson staining revealed diffuse thickness of the pulmonary alveolar wall with visible extensive fibrosis in the surviving rats of the paraquat groups regardless of NaSAL intervention. The 28 day survival rate was 100% in the normal and NaSAL control groups,significantly higher than in paraquat A( χ2= 6. 491,P = 0. 011) and B( χ2= 4. 500,P = 0. 034). The survival curves exhibited no significant differences between the paraquat A and paraquat + NaSAL A groups( χ2= 0. 243, P = 0. 622),nor between paraquat B and paraquat + NaSAL B( χ2= 0. 000,P = 0. 985). Conclusion Based on the observations of the 28 day survival rate and pathological findings,NaSAL has no protective effect against paraquat poisoning-induced lung injury in rats.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?