Abstract:In the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), a decision maker first gives linguistic pairwise comparisons, then obtains numerical pairwise comparisons by selecting certain numerical scale to quantify them, and finally derives a priority vector from the numerical pairwise comparisons. In particular, the validity of this decision-making tool relies on the choice of numerical scale and the design of prioritization method. By introducing a set of concepts regarding the linguistic variables and linguistic pairwise comparison matrices (LPCMs), and by defining the deviation measures of LPCMs, we present two performance measure algorithms to evaluate the numerical scales and the prioritization methods. Using these performance measure algorithms, we compare the most common numerical scales (the Saaty scale, the geometrical scale, the Ma–Zheng scale and the Salo–Hämäläinen scale) and the prioritization methods (the eigenvalue method and the logarithmic least squares method). In addition, we also discuss the parameter of the geometrical scale, develop a new prioritization method, and construct an optimization model to select the appropriate numerical scales for the AHP decision makers. The findings in this paper can help the AHP decision makers select suitable numerical scales and prioritization methods.

Study on the Compatibility in AHP and Satellite System Scheme Optimization

An Automatic Method to Reach Consensus in a Local Context for AHP Group Decision Making

Study on the Consistence of Judgement Matrix in AHP

An accuracy optimization method for random access inter-satellite measurement system

Genetic algorithm optimised Hadamard product method for inconsistency judgement matrix adjustment in AHP and automatic analysis system development

Possibility-Satisfiability Degree and the Test and Improvement of the Comparison Matrix' Consistency

The Weight Calculation, Consistency Test and Improvement Based on Singular Value Decomposition

Application of a method of processing inconsistency in the judgements of numerous experts

CONCEPTUAL RESEARCH ON OPTIMIZATION OF SYSTEM PARAMETER OF OPTIC REMOTE SENSING SATELLITE

On using pairwise comparison in the analytic hierarchy process: Validity is goal while consistency is means

A Study of Weight Coefficient Computing Method Based on AHP

The Analytic Hierarchy Process Based on the Unascertained Three-Valued Judgments

Optimum Decision Making of Satellite Tracking and Control Schemes Based on FAHP

Consistency Improvement in the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Topology Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis of Satellite Structure

Optimization control of systemic condition of satellite prototype based on hybrid system

A comparative study of the numerical scales and the prioritization methods in AHP

Comprehensive Evaluation of Power Quality Based on Two Improved Methods

The Unascertained Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Application in Venture Capital

Analytical Hierarchy Process Application in Comprehensive Evaluation

A synthetic evaluation method based on the Grey Analytic Hierarchy Model