Abstract:Objective To assess the difference between two dimensional ultrasonography (2DUS) and three dimensional ultrasonography (3DUS) in evaluating fetal malformations.Methods Both 2DUS and 3DUS were used to examine 40 pregnant women with fetal malformations. The diagnostic levels of 2DUS and 3DUS were compared, and the diagnostic information provided by the two methods was evaluated.Results ①Sixty two malformations were discovered by induced labor and follow up in 41 fetuses of 40 pregnant women. In 49 malformations ( 79.0 %), 2DUS made the affirmative diagnoses in accordance with the results, however, 3DUS, 58 malformations ( 93.5 %). The difference between them was statistically significant (P 0.05 ). ② In 35 ( 60.3 %) of 58 malformations discovered by 3DUS,3DUS provided more diagnostic information than 2DUS. 3DUS had particular advantages over 2DUS in evaluating the fetal malformations of cranium face, spine extremity, and body surface, with a speriority rate of 69.2 %, 100%, and 83.3 %, respectively.Conclusions The diagnostic level of 3DUS is higher than that of 2DUS, and 3DUS provides more diagnostic information in evaluating fetal malformations. Therefore, 3DUS has practical clinical value in prenatal diagnosis.

A Comparative Study Between Two- and Three-Dimensional Ultrasonography in Evaluating Fetal Malformations