Paraspinal approach combined with posterior midline approach in treatment of thoracolumbar fractures with nerve injury

LI Jing-feng,XU Zhen-hua,CHEN Liao-bin,WANG Jian-ping,ZHANG Shu-wei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2015.03.013
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical results between paraspinal approach combined with posterior midline approach and traditional posterior midline approach in treatment of thoracolumbar fractures with nerve injury. Methods From February2009 to February 2012, a total of 52 cases of thoracolumbar fractures with nerve injury were included in the study, which were divided into two groups, including 24 cases of posterior midline approach, 28 cases of paraspinal approach combined with posterior midline approach. Results All 52 patients were followed up for 18-36 months, with an average of(26 ±4.5)month.The paraspinal approach combined with posterior midline approach group had a better performance in operation time, blood loss in and after operation, and postoperative VAS score at first week(P 0.05). There were no significant differences in recovery of anterior and posterior vertebral body height, Cobb angle, and recovery of neurological function between the two groups(P 0.05). Conclusion Paraspinal approach combined with posterior midline approach in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures with nerve injury has the same clinical effect as posterior midline approach. And it has the advantages of shorter operation time, less trauma, less blood loss at operation and post operation, and faster recovery after operation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?