Clinical analysis of three operation methods for the treatment of ovarian cysts

Jie PENG,LI-na ZHANG,Wei-pei ZHU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13499/j.cnki.fqjwkzz.2015.06.412
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the clinical application value of suspensory laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of ovarian cysts by observing three different kinds of operative treatment methods for ovarian cysts.Methods:The clinical data of 120 patients who had received operative treatment for ovarian cysts between Jan.2011 and Mar.2014 were retrospectively analyzed.Of them,40 patients received suspensory laparoscopic surgery,40 underwent pneumoperitoneum laparoscopic surgery and 40 laparotomy.Comparison was made on length of operation,intraoperative amount of bleeding,postoperative pain,time of anal aerofluxus,hospital stay,hospitalization expenses,postoperative ovulation and menstruation condition of three groups.Results:Compared with open surgery group,laparoscopic group had less intraoperative bleeding,lower postoperative incision pain score and shorter hospital stay.Compared with pneumoperitoneum group,gasless laparoscopic group had shorter operation time,lower incidence of non-incision pain,fewer side effects and less operation cost( P 0.05).Conclusions:Gasless laparoscopy for ovarian cysts inherits the advantages of minimally invasive surgery in the aspects of incision cosmetic standards,little trauma and rapid recovery.Besides,with less postoperative side effect and operation time,the surgical costs are decreased and maneuverability of laparoscopic surgery is improved,which is helpful to greatly protect ovarian function and broaden the application scope of laparoscopy.With greater clinical value,it is especially suitable for those young women who have their demands for fertility,and it is also beneficial for a wide spread of the minimally invasive technique in primary hospitals.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?