Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To assess the correlations between objective measurements of 108 finished orthodontic cases and subjective assessments made by 69 orthodontic specialists, to explore the statistically significant measuring categories of cast and cephalogram and to validate the regression model.METHODS:A stratified random sample of 108 cases was drawn from the large sample of 2 383 patients who finished orthodontic treatment between July 2006 and August 2008 in six orthodontic treatment centers around China. For each patient, the post-treatment information sources evaluated in this study included standardized plaster study casts and a lateral cephalometric X-ray image. These information sources were evaluated both singly and in combination by a panel of 69 orthodontic specialists. The average subjective grading scores of 69 orthodontists were regarded as the gold standard. Six examiners used the peer assessment rating (PAR) index and American board of orthodontics-objective grading system (ABO-OGS) to measure all the study casts respectively and three other examiners measured all the lateral cephalometric X-ray images by using customized software. The objective measuring data were correlated with the gold standard. The correlations between the objective measurement and the subjective evaluation were assessed, the statistically significant measuring categories of cast and cephalogram were explored and the regression model was validated.RESULTS:The ABO-OGS scores of "occlusal relationship" correlated most strongly with the subjective scores of cast (r=0.655, P<0.01), and the secondarily correlated category with those were the PAR scores of "overjet" (r=0.525, P<0.01). The proclination of the lower incisors correlated most strongly with the subjective scores of cephalogram (r=0.446, P<0.01), and the secondarily correlated category with those was the protrusion of the lower lips (r=0.436, P<0.01). Nine components were predictive for the post-treatment model and lateral ephalometric film (Post-M+C) outcome: alignment (ABO-OGS), occlusal relationship (ABO-OGS), interproximal contact(ABO-OGS), L1/NB°, overjet (PAR), SNB°, occlusal contacts (ABO-OGS), U1/SN2° and centerline (PAR). These 9 components accounted for 72% of the variability in the average subjective grading scores.CONCLUSION:The objective regression model could replace the averaged opinion of Chinese orthodontic experts effectively, making objective assessment of orthodontic treatment outcome for Chinese patients.

A reviewed study on objectives and results in adult orthodontic treatment

Evaluation and Comparative Assessment of Clear Aligners and Conventional Appliances on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Pediatric Populations: a Cross-Sectional Study.

The preliminary study on the evaluation of the orthodontic treatment result

[Validation of Subjective and Objective Evaluation Methods for Orthodontic Treatment Outcome].

[Agreement Analysis of Subjective Evaluation of Orthodontic Treatment Outcome].

Comparison of treatment outcomes between different adult skeletal angle class Ⅲ subdivision patients treated by nonsurgical treatment

Subjective and Objective Analysis of Orthodontic Expert Consensus on the Assessment of Orthodontic Treatment Outcomes.

Research on Chinese orthodontic specialists' subjective evaluation of orthodontic treatment outcome]

Comparison of Treatment Results Between Angle Class III Subgroup Patients Treated by Maxillary Protraction with Fixed Appliance and Fixed Appliance Only

An Analysis of Orthodontic Retreatment Cases and Retreatment

Psychological Impact and Perceptions of Orthodontic Treatment of Adult Patients with Different Motivations.

A Clinical Study on the Treatment of the Occlusal Relationship of Elderly Patients with Defection of Dentition and Severe Attrition

Validation of the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System for Assessing the Treatment Outcomes of Chinese Patients

Perception of facial esthetics and cephalometric correlations in Class II patients: a comparison between two-phase and one-phase treatments

Reliability Assessment and Correlation Analysis of Evaluating Orthodontic Treatment Outcome in Chinese Patients

Effects of Two-Phase Treatment with Functional Appliances Followed by Extraction versus One-Phase Treatment with Extraction in Class II Growing Patients: A Case–Control Study

Differences in the effects of orthodontic treatment on airway-craniocervical functional environment in adult and adolescent patients with skeletal class II high-angle: a retrospective pilot study

Treatment Satisfaction and Quality of Life Changes in Patients Receiving Conventional Fixed Orthodontic Appliances and Clear Aligner Therapy: A Questionnaire Based Cross-sectional Study

[Correlation between social psychology and personality characteristics and treatment options for adult patients with skeletal malocclusion]

Quality of occlusal outcome in adult Class II patients treated with completely customized lingual appliances and Class II elastics compared to adult Class I patients

[Comparison of Extraction Versus Non-Extraction Orthodontic Treatment Results--a Preliminary Study].