Clinical Study on Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Late Stage Gastric Carcinoma

叶正宝,马韬,奚文崎,耿梅,蒋劲松,楼谷音,张芬琴,朱正纲,尹浩然
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-9610.2002.05.016
2002-01-01
Abstract:To evaluate the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with late stage gastric carcinoma, and to compare the response to intr avenous chemotherapy with that of interventional chemotherapy. Methods: Twe nty patiens with stage Ⅲb or Ⅳ gastric carcinoma were en rolled, and randomly a ssigned to receive either intravenous or intra-arterial i nterventional chemothe rapy consisting of 5-FU(with or without leucovorin)+cispl atin+pirarubicin for 2 -4 courses before undergoing surgery. Response was assess ed by pre-operative u pper gastrointestinal series, spiral CT and endoscopic ult rasonography, and by p athological examination of the resected specimen. Results: Ten of the 20 patients were downstaged(50%), and subtotal o r total gastrectomy was c arried out in 14 patients; 6 cases belonged to the int ravenous group and 8 cases to the interventional chemotherapy group. Although t here was no statistical dif ference as to the clinical response to pre-operative chemotherapy between the t wo groups, the histological response was more eviden t in the intravenous chemoth erapy group as compared with the intravenous chemot herapy group and the control group(87.5% vs 33.3% and 20%,P0.0 5). Conclusions: Pre-operative neoadjuvant chemotherapy helped to downstage cases of late st age gastric carcinoma and enhance resectability. Interventional chemotherapy see med to produce better effect than intravenous ch emotherpay.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?