Seroprevalence of SARS coronavirus antibody IgG in wild animal traders in Guangdong

余德文,李晖,许锐恒,何剑峰,林锦炎,李灵辉,黎薇,许宏建,黄少玉,黄吉城
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-5039.2003.03.003
2003-01-01
Abstract:Objective Comparing the prevalence of SARS coronavirus ( SARS CoV) antibody IgG in wild animal traders and control groups to provide the evidence for the hypothesis of a wild animal origin for SARS.Methods Serum samples were collected from wild animals traders in 3 animal markets, health care workers (HCWs) in hospital and center for disease control and prevention (CDC) and health control group in Guangzhou. ELISA test for SARS coronavirus antibody IgG with the test kit (batch No.20030501) manufactured in Beijing. Results The positive rate of SARS CoV antibody IgG in wild animal traders was 13.02% (66/508) in wild animal traders. The positive rates in civet cat, wild boar, muntjac, hare, pheasant trader were 72 7%, 57 1%, 56 3%, 46 2%, 33 3% respectively. The antibody were also detected in other animal traders including domestic cats, birds and snakes. The positive rate in hospital and CDC HCWs and health control group were 2 92%, 1 59% and 1 19% respectively. The statistical significance of the positive rate was observed between the wild animal traders and the other control groups ( χ 2 =26 089, P 0 01).Conclusion The results that the positive rate of SARS CoV antibody IgG in wild animal traders significantly higher than that of control groups seem to support the hypothesis of a wild animal origin for SARS.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?