Abstract:BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has become a well-established technique that is traditionally performed with bilateral pedicle screw (PS) fixation. There are only a small number of case reports of unilateral instrumented TLIF. To our knowledge, there have been few well-designed studies comparing unilateral versus bilateral instrumentation with TLIF.PURPOSE: To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes in a selected series of patients treated with unilateral versus bilateral PS instrumented TLIF.STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized study in one unit.PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 80 patients were enrolled in this study. Thirty-seven patients (17 men and 20 women; average age 57.1 years) were randomized to the unilateral PS group and 43 patients (18 men and 25 women; average age 58.2 years) to the bilateral PS group.OUTCOME MEASURES: The demographic data collected from both groups were gender, age, preoperative index diagnosis, degenerated segment, and single/double level of fusion. Operative time, blood loss, hospital time, and implant costs were also evaluated. Postsurgical pain and functional results were analyzed by the visual analog scale (VAS), modified Prolo (mProlo) scores, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Radiographic examinations were carried out to assess total fusion rates, screw failure, and general complications.METHODS: Patients were randomized into the unilateral or bilateral PS instrumented TLIF group based on a computer-generated number list. Patients were asked to return to hospital for follow-up at 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and thereafter once a year after surgery.RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 25.3 months, with a range of 18 to 32 months. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of demographic data. The unilateral PS group had a significantly shorter operative time, less blood loss, and reduced implant costs compared with the bilateral PS group, although hospital time was the same for double-level cases. The average postoperative VAS, mProlo, and ODI scores improved significantly in both groups, with no significant difference between groups. The total fusion rate, screw failure, and general complication rate were not significantly different.CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral PS instrumented TLIF is a viable treatment option generating better results, especially in terms of operative time, blood loss, and hospital time for single-level disease and implant costs. No decrease in the fusion rate or increase in the complication rate was observed in this group. Further improved study design and a longer period of follow-up are needed to confirm this effect. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Clinical comparative analysis of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation

The anatomical characteristics and the analysis to clinical efficacy about modified minimally invasive surgery TILF by muscle space approach and bilateral fixation and unilateral decompression

Comparison of Three Different Posterior Fixation Techniques in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Two-Level Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: at a Mean Follow Up Time of 46 Months

Unilateral Versus Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation In Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Monocentric Study Of 215 Patients With A Minimum Of 4-Year Follow-Up

[Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(MIS-TLIF): a Meta analysis].

Clinical Study of Unilateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases

Unilateral Versus Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation Combined with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Low Lumbar Degenerative Disc Diseases: Analysis of Clinical and Radiographic Results.

Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar internal fixation by unilateral versus bilateral pedi-cle screw in treatment of single level lumbar disc herniation in the young and mid-aged pa-tients

Comparison of Unilateral Versus Bilateral Instrumented Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Diseases.

The combined use of unilateral pedicle screw and contralateral facet joint screw fixation in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Comparison Of Unilateral Versus Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation In Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis Of Twelve Randomized Controlled Trials

Unilateral pedicle screw fixation with interbody fusion technique for lumbar degenerative disorders

Preliminary report on minimally invasive unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar spinal degenerative disease

Comparison of lumbar interbody fusion performed with unilateral or bilateral pedicle screw.

Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation with lumbar interbody fusion in treating lumbar degenerative disease

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral or bilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases

Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral versus bilateral instrumentation in two-level degenerative lumbar diseases

Unilateral Versus Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis

Clinical efficiency of unilateral vs bilateral pedicle screws system combined with TLIF for lumbar degenerative disease in elderly patients