Stability design of flat-bottom circular steel silos--silo loading

Song Chang-yong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6578.2003.03.012
2003-01-01
Abstract:The present paper introduced five well-known silo loading codes. They were compared with the newly edited Chinese silo code. The investigation indicated that: the Chinese code only involved issues on symmetrical component of wall loads for concentric filling and concentric emptying. There were systematic differences between the Chinese code and other five silo loading codes. The deleterious effects of non-symmetrical components of wall loads on structural behavior are ignored in the Chinese code. The symmetrical frictional wall pressures predicted by the Chinese code are much smaller than those by other five silo loading codes, while the modification factor for the horizontal wall pressures is bigger. For typical silo geometries (H/D=2, D = 20 m) and common bulk solid (wheat), the accumulated axial compressive forces at the bottom of the silo is about 48%~85% of the values determined according to other five silo loading codes, while the modification factor for the horizontal wall pressure is about 33%~54% larger than the counter values. Therefore, design of steel silos with the Chinese code is economic, but on the other hand, it may be unsafe in some cases. The results presented in this paper can be adopted for future draft of silo loading codes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?